Qualitative research in psychology: the bricoleur-researcher vs. the machine-trick researcher

Authors

Keywords:

Qualitative research, Machine-trick researcher, Bricoleur-researcher, Psychology, Objectivity.

Abstract

This article aims to examine how research in social sciences is likely to be over procedure-oriented and quite distant from creativity, thus being less effective in dealing with the studied phenomenon. In pursuit of objectivity, psychology researchers have defined experimentation as the best investigation device and consequently devalued interpretive approaches, running the risk of studying mere peripheral phenomena. The present article is conducted through literature research and conceptual analysis around the opposition of two types of researcher positions: the machine-trick researcher, according to Becker’s perspective (1977), versus the bricoleur or communicative researcher, as named by Denzin and Lincoln (2006), and Spink (2008), respectively. In conclusion, the well-trained researcher can get loose from technical formalization in order to create what his/her studied phenomenon and context require. Therefore, it can be asserted that the bricoleur-researcher type better meets the conditions of qualitative research in social sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elisangela Barboza Fernandes, Universidade de São Paulo

Psychologist, PhD in Social Psychology from the University of São Paulo and the University Paris Descartes.

Eduardo de Carvalho Martins, Universidade Federal Paulista/Baixada Santista.

Psychologist. Doctor in Psychoanalytic Theory, Teacher researcher at the Federal University of São Carlos and psychologist at the Federal University of São Paulo / Santos.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-10

How to Cite

FERNANDES, Elisangela Barboza; MARTINS, Eduardo de Carvalho. Qualitative research in psychology: the bricoleur-researcher vs. the machine-trick researcher. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, [S. l.], v. 36, n. 2, p. 69–80, 2016. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminasoc/article/view/24141. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Artigos Seção Livre

License

Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas adopts the CC-BY-NC license for its publications, the copyright being held by the author, in cases of republication we recommend that authors indicate first publication in this journal.

This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and develop the material, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. And due credit must be given to the creator.

The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
The magazine reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the writing style of the authors. Changes, corrections or suggestions of a conceptual nature will be sent to the authors when necessary.