Qualitative research in psychology: the bricoleur-researcher vs. the machine-trick researcher

Authors

Keywords:

Qualitative research, Machine-trick researcher, Bricoleur-researcher, Psychology, Objectivity.

Abstract

This article aims to examine how research in social sciences is likely to be over procedure-oriented and quite distant from creativity, thus being less effective in dealing with the studied phenomenon. In pursuit of objectivity, psychology researchers have defined experimentation as the best investigation device and consequently devalued interpretive approaches, running the risk of studying mere peripheral phenomena. The present article is conducted through literature research and conceptual analysis around the opposition of two types of researcher positions: the machine-trick researcher, according to Becker’s perspective (1977), versus the bricoleur or communicative researcher, as named by Denzin and Lincoln (2006), and Spink (2008), respectively. In conclusion, the well-trained researcher can get loose from technical formalization in order to create what his/her studied phenomenon and context require. Therefore, it can be asserted that the bricoleur-researcher type better meets the conditions of qualitative research in social sciences.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Elisangela Barboza Fernandes, Universidade de São Paulo

Psychologist, PhD in Social Psychology from the University of São Paulo and the University Paris Descartes.

Eduardo de Carvalho Martins, Universidade Federal Paulista/Baixada Santista.

Psychologist. Doctor in Psychoanalytic Theory, Teacher researcher at the Federal University of São Carlos and psychologist at the Federal University of São Paulo / Santos.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-10

How to Cite

FERNANDES, E. B.; MARTINS, E. de C. Qualitative research in psychology: the bricoleur-researcher vs. the machine-trick researcher. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, [S. l.], v. 36, n. 2, p. 69–80, 2016. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminasoc/article/view/24141. Acesso em: 17 may. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Artigos Seção Livre

License

Os Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados são de direito da Revista Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores.
Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário. Nesses casos, os artigos, depois de adequados, deverão ser submetidos a nova apreciação.
As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.