Estimation of chemical composition, in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, net energy lactation values of different peanut varieties and line by Hohenheim in vitro gas production technique

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p907

Palabras clave:

Peanut, Nutrient composition, In vitro gas production, Metabolizable energy.

Resumen

This study was carried out to determine the nutritional value of some selected peanut varieties and line in the Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute of Adana, Turkey. The peanut varieties used were Gazipasa, Sultan, NC7, Cihangir, and Halisbey; while the peanut line was DA335/2011. The chemical composition, metabolizable energy (ME), net energy lactation (NEL) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) of the selected peanut varieties and line were determined through Hohenheim in vitro gas production technique. Incubation times for Hohenheim gas production technique were 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours. The analysis of variance (General Linear Model) was carried out using the SPSS package program. The differences among groups in terms of nutrient contents were found to be significant  (P<ou=0.05), except for dry matter (DM) and hemicellulose (HC). The highest crude protein (CP) (40.13%) was found in Sultan variety, while the crude oil (CO) content was found to be between 21.32 and 31.01%. The ADF, NDF, and ADL content of the peanut varieties and line were within the ranges of 2.32-7.91%, 4.85-9.88%, and 0.43-2.62%, respectively. Conversely, the Sultan variety had the highest crude cellulose (CC) value, Cihangir variety was determined to contain the highest hemicellulose (HC) value. The differences in 24 hour gas and methane production among different peanut varieties and line were found to be not-significant. (P > 0.05).

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Tugay Ayasan, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University

Associate Prof. Dr., Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Kadirli Academy of Applied Sciences, Osmaniye, Turkey.

Ismail Ulger, Erciyes University Seyrani Agricultural Faculty

Associate Prof. Dr., Erciyes University Agricultural Faculty, Department of Animal Science, Kayseri, Turkey.

Ayse Nuran Cil, East Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute

Dr., East Mediterrenean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana, Turkey.

Vincenzo Tufarelli, University of Bari

DETO - Section of Veterinary Science and Animal Production, University of Bari, Valenzano, Italy

Vito Laudadio, University of Bari

DETO - Section of Veterinary Science and Animal Production, University of Bari, Valenzano, Italy

Valiollah Palangi, Agricultural Faculty, Ataturk University

Dr., Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

Citas

Akkaya, M. R., Yucel, H., Duman, A. D., Didin, M., Ozer, E. A., & Kola, O. (2017). Determination of some quality characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS). Derim, 34(1), 37-42. doi: 10.16882/derim.2017.305312

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990). Official methods of analysis (14nd ed.). Arlington, Virginia: AOAC.

Arıoglu, H. H. (2014). Peanut cultivation and reclamation, Oil Plants Textbook, Ç.U. Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Chapter No: 220, Y. No: A-70, S.74, Adana.

Arıoglu, H. H., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L., Kurt, C., & Onat, B. (2016). Ana ürün koşullarında yetiştirilen bazı yerfıstığı çeşitlerinin önemli agronomik ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(Özel konu 2), 24-29. doi: 10.21566/tarbitderg.281656

Asibuo, J. Y., Akromah, R., Adu-Dapaah, H. K., & Kantanka, O. S. (2008). Evaluation of nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) from Ghana. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 8(2), 133-149. doi: 10.4314/ajfand.v8i2.19185

Asık, F. F., Yıldız, R., & Arıoglu, H. A. (2018). Osmaniye koşullarına uygun yeni yerfıstığı çeşitleri ile bunların önemli tarımsal ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 21(6), 825-836. doi: 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.452842

Azizi, M., Seidavi, A. R., Ragni, M., Laudadio, V., & Tufarelli, V. (2018). Practical applications of agricultural wastes in poultry feeding in Mediterranean and Middle East regions. Part 1: citrus, grape, pomegranate and apple wastes. World's Poultry Science Journal, 74(3), 489-498. doi: 10.1017/S004393 3918000478

Barbara, S., Charrondiere, U. R., Enujiugha, V. N., Bayili, R. G., Fagbohoun, E. G., Samb, B., Burlingame, B. (2012). West African Food Composition Table. pp. 25-74. https://www.bioversityinternational. org/fileadmin/_migrated/uploads/tx_news/West_African_food_composition_table___Table_de_composition_des_aliments_d%e2%80%99Afrique_de_l%e2%80%99Ouest_1522.pdf

Caliskan, S., Caliskan, M. E., Arslan, M., & Arıoglu, H. (2008). Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean type environment in Turkey. Field Crops Research, 105(1-2), 131-140. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.08.007

Campos-Mondragón, M. G., De La Calderon, B. A. M., Durán-Prado, A., Campos-Reyes, L.C., Oliart-Ros, R.M., Ortega-García, J., Angulo, O. (2009). Nutritional composition of new peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars. Grasas Y Aceites, 60(2), 161-167. doi: 10.3989/gya.075008

Canavar, Ö. (2011). Farklı hasat zamanlarının yerfıstığının verim ve verim unsurları ile yağ asitleri kompozisyonu ve aflatoksin konsantrasyonu üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı, Aydın, Türkiye.

Cil, A. N., Cil, A., Akkaya, M. R., & Sahin, V. (2016). Çukurova koşullarına uygun geliştirilen yerfıstığı (arachis hypogaea l.) genotiplerinin bazı tarımsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(Special Issue 2), 18-23. doi: 10.21566/tarbitderg.281607

Ginting, E., Rahmianna, A. A., & Yusnawan, E. (2018). Aflatoxin and nutrient contents of peanut collected from local market and their processed foods. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 102(1), 012031. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/102/1/012031

Hepsag, F. (2018). Determination of quality characteristics of peanut paste produced in Osmaniye province. Adyütayam, 6(2), 55-66.

Ibraheem, S. E., Kabeir, B. M., Mohammed, L. H., & Bhagiel, B. T. (2015). Nutritional composition and energy value of roasted peanut milk partially substituted with millet thin porridge fermented with bifidobacterium longum BB536. International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research, 3(9), 63-69.

Kadiroglu, A. (2012). Yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) yetiştiriciliğinde farklı çeşitler ve sıra üzeri mesafelere göre tek ve çift sıralı ekim yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Doktora tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi FBE Tarla Bitkileri ABD Doktora Tezi, Isparta, Türkiye.

Karabulut, B., & Tuncturk, R. (2019). Diyarbakır-Bismil ekolojik koşullarında ana ürün olarak yetiştirilen yerfıstığı (arachis hypogaea l.) çeşitlerinin tarımsal ve kalite özelliklerinin araştırılması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(2), 97-104.

Kılınccerker, M. B., & Arıoglu, H. (2019). Çukurova koşullarında yetiştirilen bazı virginia tipi yerfıstığı çeşitlerinin önemli kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Türkiye 13. Ulusal, 1. Uluslararası Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 01-04 Kasım, ss:245-252, Antalya.

Kokten, K., Kaplan, M., Seydesoglu, S., Ozdemir, S., & Boydak, E. (2014). Farklı yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea) çeşitlerinin kuru otlarına ait hayvan besleme değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2),156-160.

Kurt, C., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L., Onat, B., & Arıoglu, H. (2016). Çukurova bölgesinde ikinci ürün koșullarında bazı yerfıstığı çeșitlerinin önemli agronomik ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 112-119.

Latif, S., Pfannstiel, J., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2013). Amino acid composition, antinutrients and allergens in the peanut protein fraction obtained by an aqueous enzymatic process. Food Chemistry, 136(1), 213-217. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.120

Macar, T. F., Macar, O., Cil, A. N., Oluk, C. A., & Cil, A. (2018). Assessment of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes in terms of some nutritional and antioxidant parameters. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22(3), 1175-1181. doi: 10.19113/sdufenbed.471805

Menke, A. H., & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis an in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 28(7), 55.

Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., & Fritz, D. (1979). The estimation of digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science, 93(1), 217-222. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086 305

Mora-Escobedo, R., Hernández-Luna, P., Joaquín-Torres, I. C., Ortiz-Moreno, A., & Robles-Ramírez, M. D. C. (2015). Physicochemical properties and fatty acid profile of eight peanut varieties grown in Mexico. CyTA-Journal of Food, 13(2), 300-304. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2014.971345.

Oteng-Frimpong, R., Konlan, S. P., & Denwar, N. N. (2017). Evaluation of selected groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) lines for yield and haulm nutritive quality traits. Hindawi International Journal of Agronomy, 7479309, 9. doi: 10.1155/2017/7479309

Pinkerton, B. (2005). Forage quality. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service. Forage fact sheet 2. Cooperative Extension Service, Clemson University.

Rao, H., Tian, Y., Fu, W., & Xue, W. (2018). In vitro digestibility and immunoreactivity of thermally processed peanut. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 29(1), 989-1001. doi: 10.1080/09540105.2018. 1499710.

Sahin, G. (2014). Türkiye’de yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) yetiştiriciliği ve bir coğrafi işaret olarak Osmaniye yerfıstığı. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(3), 619-644. doi: 10.21547/jss. 256812

Seidavi, A. R., Azizi, M., Ragni, M., Laudadio, V., & Tufarelli, V. (2018). Practical applications of agricultural wastes in poultry feeding in Mediterranean and Middle East regions. Part 2: tomato, olive, date, sunflower wastes. World's Poultry Science Journal, 74(3), 443-452. doi: 10.1017/S00439339180 0051X

Sezmis, G., & Gursoy, E. (2020). Determination of relative feed value, net energy lactation and metabolic energy contents of alfaalfa. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 29(3), 1637-1642.

Shibli, S., Siddique, F., Raza, S., Ahsan, Z., & Raza, I. (2019). Chemical composition and sensory analysis of peanut butter from indigenous peanut cultivars of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 32(1), 159-169. doi: 10.17582/journal.pjar/2019/32.1.159.169

SPSS (1999). Statistical Package for Social Sciences Chicago, Illinois, USA: SPPS Inc.

Tufarelli, V., Introna, M., Cazzato, E., Mazzei, D., & Laudadio, V. (2013). Suitability of partly destoned exhausted olive cake as by-product feed ingredient for lamb production. Journal of Animal Science, 91(2), 872-877. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5541

Van Soest, P. J. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 50(1), 50-55. doi: 10.1093/ jaoac/50.1.50

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. D., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Weiss, W. P., Conrad, H. R., & St Pierre, N. R. (1992). A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible, nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 39(1-2), 95-110. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4

Yadav, P. B., Edukondalu, L., Patel, S., & Rao, D. B. (2018). Proximate composition of peanut milk prepared by different methods. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(10), 2388-2391. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.276

Yang, C. M. (2005). Proteolysis, fermentation efficiency, and in vitro ruminal digestion of peanut stover ensiled with raw or heated corn. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(8), 2903-2910. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72971-4

Yolbas, M. (2018). Farklı ekim zamanlarının Siirt koşullarında yerfıstığı (Arachis Hypogaea L.)’nın verim ve verim unsurları üzerine etkisi.Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Siirt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Siirt, Türkiye.

Yuan, J., & Wan, X. (2019). Multiple-factor associative effects of peanut shell combined with alfalfa and concentrate determined by in vitro gas production method. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 64(8), 352-360. doi: 10.17221/94/2019-CJAS

Zahran, H. A., & Tawfeuk, H. Z. (2019). Physicochemical properties of new peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties. OCL, 26(19), 1-7. doi: 10.1051/ocl/2019018

Zaki, N. M., Amal, G., Ahmed, M., Hassanein, S., & Mohamed, M. H. (2017). Effect of organic and bio-fertilizer on yield and some chemical composition of two peanut cultivars under newly reclaimed sandy soil condition. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(4), 937-943.

Zhang, J., Wang, C., Tang, Y., & Wang, X. (2009). Effects of grading on the main quality attributes of peanut kernels. Frontiers of Agriculture China, 3(3), 291-293. doi: 10.1007/s11703-009-0050-x

Descargas

Publicado

2021-02-24

Cómo citar

Ayasan, T., Ulger, I., Nuran Cil, A., Tufarelli, V., Laudadio, V., & Palangi, V. (2021). Estimation of chemical composition, in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, net energy lactation values of different peanut varieties and line by Hohenheim in vitro gas production technique. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 42(2), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p907

Número

Sección

Artigos