Agroeconomic yield of Taro clones in function of number of hilling operation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1673Keywords:
Colocasia esculenta, Clones, Cultivation, Income.Abstract
More than 800 species of Araceae have economic (ornamental, edible or medicinal) or ethnobotanic importance, and about 10% of the world population use taro rhizome (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) in feeding. The agroeconomic yield of Chinês and Macaquinho taro clones was evaluated, when cultivated without hilling operation and under one hilling at 58 days after planting – DAP, and under two hillings, at 58 and 86 DAP, in the environment conditions of Dourados-MS. Harvest was carried at 202 DAP, when agronomic and economic analysis were performed. ‘Chinês’ taro plants presented 123.5% and 86.9% higher results for fresh and dry weight of leaves, respectively, when compared to Macaquinho clone. Fresh weight of corms-RM, commercial cormel-RFC and noncommercial cormel-RFNC of ‘Macaquinho’ taro plants were respectively 24.9%, 193.8% and 19.4% statistically superiors than ‘Chinês’ taro plants. There was no significant difference of treatments among hilling operations on fresh and dry weight productions of RM, RFC and RFNC. Comparing net incomes, Macaquinho clone plants had better results when grown under two hilling operations, inducing increases of R$ 6,784.6 and R$ 11,181.2 for cultivation with one hilling and without it, respectively.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.