Poultry performance in different grazing densities: forage characteristics, losses due to grazing and feed intake

Authors

  • Luciano Cristiano França Instituto de Zootecnia
  • Josiane Aparecida de Lima Instituto de Zootecnia
  • Flávia Maria de Andrade Gimenes Instituto de Zootecnia
  • Vicente José Maria Savino Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
  • Antonio Augusto Domingos Coelho Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
  • Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz Instituto de Zootecnia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n2p939

Keywords:

Alternative poultry, Animal welfare, Cynodon spp. cv. Coastcross-1, Pennisetum Clandestinum, Stylosanthes sp.

Abstract

Morphological characteristics of three forage species grazed by rustic poultry in stocking were evaluated. Coast-cross fodder, kikuyu grass, and stylosanthes were planted in 33-m2 paddocks with two densities (m2/animal): D1 = 3m2/animal and D2 = 1m2/animal. The design was a randomized complete block with a 3 x 2 factorial (three grasses and two densities) and three replications. Grass canopy height, grass mass, morphological composition (leaf, stem, and dead material), losses due to grazing, poultry weight gain and consumption, and concentrate feed conversion ratio and efficiency were evaluated. At the end of the experiment, forage and leaves masses were considered low to stylosanthes in D2 (0.28 to 0.03 kg/m2) and to kikuyu grass in D1 (0.13 to 0.05 kg/m2) and in D2 (0.11 and 0.03 kg/m2), respectively. In addition, the grass canopy height was considered low for stylosanthes (6.50 cm) that could jeopardize the entry of new poultry lot. The three grass species had similar weight gain and revealed better results for 3m²/ chicken (3.20 kg/animal). Coast-cross fodder, kikuyu grass, and stylosanthes, with some exceptions, can be considered suitable for grazing fattening poultry at 3m2/animal at the evaluated time of the year (autumn).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luciano Cristiano França, Instituto de Zootecnia

Discente do Curso de Mestrado em Produção Animal Sustentável, Instituto de Zootecnia. IZ, Nova Odessa, SP.

Josiane Aparecida de Lima, Instituto de Zootecnia

Discente do Curso de Mestrado em Produção Animal Sustentável, Instituto de Zootecnia, IZ, Nova Odessa, SP.

Flávia Maria de Andrade Gimenes, Instituto de Zootecnia

Profª Drª de Pós-Graduação em Produção Animal Sustentável, Pesquisadora Científica do IZ, Nova Odessa, SP.

Vicente José Maria Savino, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz

Prof. Dr. do Deptº de Genética da Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP.

Antonio Augusto Domingos Coelho, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz

Prof. Dr. do Deptº de Genética da Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP.

Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz, Instituto de Zootecnia

Profª Drª de Pós-Graduação em Produção Animal Sustentável, Pesquisadora Científica do IZ, Nova Odessa, SP.

Published

2014-04-28

How to Cite

França, L. C., Lima, J. A. de, Gimenes, F. M. de A., Savino, V. J. M., Coelho, A. A. D., & Paz, C. C. P. de. (2014). Poultry performance in different grazing densities: forage characteristics, losses due to grazing and feed intake. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 35(2), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n2p939

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.