Nitrogen nutrition in maize fertilized with urease inhibitor-treated urea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n1p157Keywords:
NBPT, Zea mays, Leaf diagnosis, Time of sampling, Doses of N.Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of urea doses in coverage treated with NBPT on the production components and on the grain yield maize crop, in commercial field conditions. The experiment was carried out in Mauá da Serra, PR, in the season 2007/2008, in dystrophic Red Latosol, cultivated for 30 years under no-tillage system. The experimental design was randomized blocks with five replications and six treatments. The treatments were different doses of N (0; 40; 80; 120; 160 and 200 kg ha-1 of N). The diameter of the cob and the protein content increased linearly with increasing doses of N. The height of the cob, height of the plant, length of the cob and grain yield presented quadratic response, with the maximum value obtained in the following doses: 145; 142; 125 and 146 kg ha-1 of N, respectively. The forms of N measured originated higher levels in the leaves sampled as entire, independent of the tissue and the time sampled. The leaf tissue that best represented the nutritional status of the maize was the F6 leaf and, the readings performed on the scanner showed good negative correlation with the N-total content of the leaf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.
