Access to justice through extrajudicial notary’s office: obstacle of resolution n° 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice as regards the succession of the partner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p182-198Keywords:
Access to justice. Stable union. Succession. Extrajudicial services. Inventory.Abstract
The Federal Constitution of 1988 protected new family nuclei. the art. 226, § 3, recognized the stable union as a family entity. Because of the debates regarding the succession of the partner, differentiating it from the succession of the spouse, there was the judgment of Extraordinary Appeals (RE) No. 1790 of the Civil Code. However, the extrajudicial inventory process, dealt with by Resolution No. 35/2007 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), provides for differences for the partner's access to justice before the Extrajudicial Services, when he is the only heir. The reasons for maintaining the limitation contained in art.18 of Resolution No. 35/2007 of the CNJ regarding the extrajudicial inventory of the partner when he is the only heir are questioned. It is investigated whether there is a legal or jurisprudential basis that justifies the requirement of filing a lawsuit by the partner in the absence of other successors of the author of the inheritance; or if this is an obstacle to effective access to justice. It was based on the deductive method, on studies by Cappelletti and Garth, on the analysis of Extraordinary Resources and Resolution n° 35. Therefore, there is a need to change art. 18 of Resolution no. 35 of the CNJ.
References
BRASIL. Código Civil. Diário Oficial República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/l10406compilada.htm> Acesso em: 18 dez. 2021.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Código de Processo Civil. Diário Oficial República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 16 mar 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Lei/L13105.htm>. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2022.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Justiça em números 2021. Brasília, 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/relatorio-justica-em-numeros2021-12.pdf>. Acesso em: 07 jun 2022.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Resolução n° 35, de 24 de abril de 2007. Disciplina a aplicação da Lei nº 11.441/07 pelos serviços notariais e de registro. Disponível em: <https://atos.cnj.jus.br/files/resolucao_35_24042007_26032019143704.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 fev 2022.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Resolução n° 125, de 29 de novembro de 2010. Dispõe sobre a Política Judiciária Nacional de tratamento adequado dos conflitos de interesses no âmbito do Poder Judiciário e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Disponível em: <http://www.cnj.jus.br/busca-atos- adm? documento=2579>. Acesso em: 05 mar 2022.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Recurso Extraordinário nº 646.721 RS. Relator: Marco Aurélio. Data de Julgamento: 10/05/2017. Tribunal Pleno, Data de Publicação: 11/09/2017. Disponível em: <https://stf.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/769815076/recurso-extraordinario-re-646721-rs-rio-grande-do-sul/inteiro-teor-769815086>. Acesso em: 28 mar 2022.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Repercussão Geral no Recurso Extraordinário nº 878.694 MG. Relator: Roberto Barroso. Data de Julgamento: 16/04/2015. Tribunal Pleno, Data de Publicação: 19/05/2015. Disponível em: <https://stf.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/311628824/repercussao-geral-no-recurso-extraordinario-re-878694-mg>. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro; GARTH, Bryan. Acesso à Justiça. Trad. Ellen Gracie Northfleet. Porto Alegre: Fabris Editora, 1988.
CAPPELLETTI Mauro. Os métodos alternativos de solução de conflitos no quadro do movimento universal de acesso à justiça. Revista de Processo, São Paulo, ano 19, n.74, p.82-97, abr./jun. 1994.
DINIZ, Maria Helena. Código Civil Anotado. 16. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
GONÇALVES, Carlos Roberto. Direito Civil Brasileiro: direito das sucessões. Vol. 7. 7. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.
GORETTI, Ricardo. Mediação e Acesso à Justiça. 2 ed. Editora Juspodivm: Salvador, 2021.
WATANABE, Kazuo. Acesso à justiça e sociedade moderna. In: GRINOVER, Ada Pellegrini; DINAMARCO, Cândido Rangel; WATANABE, Kazuo (Coords.). Participação e processo. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1998.
WATANABE, Kazuo. Acesso à ordem jurídica justa (conceito atualizado de acesso à justiça) – Processos coletivos e outros estudos. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal’s articles are of their sole responsibility.
