Concausas da crise do poder judiciário e insuficiência das reformas

Monica Bonetti Couto; Luiz Felipe Rossini

doi:10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p213

Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms

Authors

Monica Bonetti Couto Professora Permanente e Pesquisadora do Programa de Mestrado em Direito da Universidade Nove de Julho (São Paulo)
Luiz Felipe Rossini Mestrando da Universidade Nove de Julho - São Paulo.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p213

Keywords:

Judiciary, crisis, legislative reforms

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the crisis of the Judiciary, as a background to the observation that legislative reforms - especially those carried out in the last decade, including the recent edition of the New Code of Civil Procedure - have proven insufficient for the aimed at concretizing and effecting the principle of efficiency within the scope of the Judiciary. To this end, the present study is divided into two parts or sections. In the first one, the figures related to the Judiciary will be presented (numbers of the cases provided by official bodies), in particular the official surveys of the National Council of Justice, followed, in a second moment, by an attempt to systematize the concauses of the judicialization in Brazil and of the measures adopted so far to confront it, which allowed us to conclude that the reforms that had hitherto been undertaken were insufficient, mainly normative. The research adopts the hypothetico-deductive approach and the inductive methods. It is also useful for the dialectical method, with the aim of seeking possible syntheses for the divergences raised. Therefore, it is diagnostic research, with data on the first part and analysis of concausas of such numbers in the subsequent part, in which we established the distortion of judicialization, driven by culture of litigation, by and gigantism in reason of the low effectiveness of the guardianship courts as concausas for the so-called judicial crisis. The type of research is the bibliographical one, from books and scientific articles.

Author Biographies

Monica Bonetti Couto, Professora Permanente e Pesquisadora do Programa de Mestrado em Direito da Universidade Nove de Julho (São Paulo)

Doutora e Mestre em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Sâo Paulo. Especialista em Direito Processual Civil pela Universidade Federal do Paraná. Professora Permanente e Pesquisadora do Programa de Mestrado em Direito da Universidade Nove de Julho (São Paulo).

Luiz Felipe Rossini, Mestrando da Universidade Nove de Julho - São Paulo.

Mestrando em Direito pela Universidade Nove de Julho; Especialista em Processo Civil pela Escola Paulista de Magistratura; Formado em Direito pela Universidade Mackenzie; Professor de Direito Civil na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nove de Julho e Assistente Judiciário junto ao TJ/SP

Downloads

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Published

2018-07-31

How to Cite

Couto, M. B., & Rossini, L. F. (2018). Concausas of the crisis in the judiciary and insufficiency of reforms. Scientia Iuris, 22(2), 213–243. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n2p213

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Artigos

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal’s articles are of their sole responsibility.