Information literacy in academic writing to avoid plagiarism

a study in students of higher education at brazilian universities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n3p255

Keywords:

Plagiarism, Information literacy, Higher education, Academic writing

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to verify the perception and knowledge of students in the first and fifth semesters of two undergraduate courses at the Federal University of São Carlos regarding academic plagiarism.
Methodology: Data collection was carried out through an online questionnaire, applied to a total of 178 students. A total of 99 respondents returned completed questionnaires.
Results: According to the results, most participants said they had heard about plagiarism before entering university. They demonstrated understanding of what plagiarism is and claim, for the most part, that they quote sources when developing their academic work. No difference was identified between the responses of students in the first and fifth periods in relation to plagiarism, indicating that the course disciplines contributed little to add knowledge on the subject.
Conclusions: It is concluded that the librarian's role in information literacy initiatives needs to encompass aspects of academic writing, given that the activities of search and use of information, in the university context, are always embedded in the context of the production of academic texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Thaís Aparecida de Lima, Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL-MG

Master in Information Science from the Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). Librarian-Documentalist at the Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Poços de Caldas, Brasil.

Ariadne Chloë Mary Furnival , Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar

PhD in Science and Technology Policy from the Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Professor at the Department of Information Science and the Postgraduate Programs in Information Science and Science, Technology and Society, at the Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brasil.

Helen de Castro Silva Casarin, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

PhD in Literature from the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP). Professor at the Department of Information Science and Coordinator of the Postgraduate Program at the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo, Brasil.

Marta Pagán Martínez, UFSCar

Doutora em Técnicas e Métodos Atuais em Informação e Documentação, Departamento de Tecnologias da Informação, pela Universidade de Murcia, Espanha. Professora Colaboradora nos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (PPGCI) e em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade (PPGCTS), da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar).

References

ALVES, A. P. M. Competência informacional e o uso ético da informação na produção científica. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2018. 208 p. (v. 1).

AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION - ALA. Report of the Presidential Committee on information literacy: final report. Washington, D.C: ALA, 10 jan.1989. Disponível em: http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES - ACRL. Framework for information literacy for higher education. Chicago: ACRL, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

BRASIL. Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Casa Civil, 1998. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9610.htm. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

BUNDY, A. (ed.). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: principles, standards and practice. 2nd. ed. Adelaide: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIL), 2004. Disponível em: https://adbu.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Infolit-2nd-edition.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

CNPq anuncia diretrizes éticas para pesquisa científica. Inovação Tecnológica, Plantão, [S. l.], 26 out. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.inovacaotecnologica.com.br/noticias/noticia.php?artigo=cnpq-diretrizes-eticas-pesquisa&id=010175111026#.XC2S-DBKjIU. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

DIAS, W. T.; EISENBERG, Z. W. Vozes diluídas no plágio: a (des) construção autoral entre alunos de licenciaturas. Pro-Posições, Campinas, v. 26, n. 1, p. 179-197, jan./abr. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/pp/a/3cfyyMFB7WrTWpxHx5WsSBf/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

DÍAZ ARCE, D. Plagio académico en estudiantes de bachillerato: ¿qué detecta Turnitin? RUIDERAe: Revista de Unidades de Información, Ciudad Real, v. 9, 2016. Disponível em: https://revista.uclm.es/index.php/ruiderae/article/view/1146. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

DINIZ, D.; TERRA, A. Plágio: palavras escondidas. Brasília: LetrasLivres; Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz, 2014.

DOYLE, C. S. Information literacy in an information society: a concept for the information age. New York: Syracuse University, 1994. Disponível em: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED372763.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

DUDZIAK, E. A. A Information literacy e o papel educacional das bibliotecas. 2001. 187 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência da Informação e Documentação) - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2001. Disponível em: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/27/27143/tde-30112004-151029/pt-br.php. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2024.

DUDZIAK, E. A. Information literacy: princípios, filosofia e prática. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 32, n. 1, p. 23-35, jan./abr. 2003. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ci/a/xDBTqDKvmcsvMnmwLWprjmG/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2024.

ESPINOZA-FREIRE, E. E. El plagio un flagelo en el ámbito académico ecuatoriano. Universidad y Sociedad, Cienfuegos, v. 12, n. 3, p. 407-415, 2020. Disponível em: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2218-36202020000300407. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO (FAPESP). Código de boas práticas científicas. São Paulo: FAPESP, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/boaspraticas/FAPESP-Codigo_de_Boas_Praticas_Cientificas_2014.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

FARIAS, S. A. Pânico na Academia! Inteligência Artificial na construção de textos científicos com o uso do ChatGPT. Revista Interdisciplinar de Marketing, Maringá, v. 13, n. 1, p. 79-83, jan/jun. 2023. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/rimar/article/view/66865. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2024.

GIBSON, C.; MEADE, John. Internet resource discovery: the role of critical thinking. In: LEONHARDT, T. W. (ed.). LOEX of the West: teaching and learning in a climate of constant change. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1996. p. 137–146. (Foundations in Library and Information Science, v. 34).

GIOVANELLI, L.; KEENER, M. How to talk about copyright so kids will listen, and how to listen about copyright so kids will talk an assignment at the intersection of multimodal writing and intellectual property. In: GRACE, V. (ed.). Teaching information literacy and writing studies. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2019. cap. 18, p. 223-240. (Purdue information literacy handbooks, v. 2). Disponível em: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=pilh. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, [S. l.], v.58, n.4, p. 422-462, 2002. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249366184_Domain_analysis_in_information_science_Eleven_approaches_-_Traditional_as_well_as_innovative. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

JOHNSTON, B.; WEBBER, S. Information Literacy in Higher Education: a review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 335-352, Aug. 2003. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070309295. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

KIRKPATRICK, K. Evitando plágio. Tradução de Jackson Aquino. [S. l.]: DePauw University, 2001. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/352423/mod_resource/content/1/O%20que%20%C3%A9%20pl%C3%A1gio.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr.2023.

KOLTAY, T.; ŠPIRANEC, S.; KARVALICS, L. Z. Research 2.0 and the future of information literacy. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2016.

KROKOSCZ, M. Autoria e plágio: um guia para estudantes, professores, pesquisadores e editores. São Paulo, Atlas, 2012.

OCHOA, C. Amostragem não probabilística: amostra por conveniência. Netquest, [S. l.], 21 out. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.netquest.com/blog/br/blog/br/amostra-conveniencia. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

QUEZADA, T. Information literacy and writing studies the beachfront instructors and students navigate. In: GRACE, V. (ed.). Teaching information literacy and writing studies. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2019. cap. 1, p. 17-27. (Purdue information literacy handbooks, v. 2). Disponível em: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=pilh. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

RYDER, P. M.; SMITH, D.; KRISTENSEN, R. G. Writing as a way of knowing: teaching epistemic research across the university. In: GRACE, V. (ed.). Teaching information literacy and writing studies. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2019. cap. 1, p. 3-16. (Purdue information literacy handbooks, v. 2). Disponível em: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=pilh. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

SECKER, J.; COONAN, E. A New Curriculum of Information Literacy: transitional, transferable, transformational. [S. l.]: Arcadia Project; Cambridge University Library, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/244638/ANCIL_final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

VITORINO, E. V.; PIANTOLA, D. Dimensões da competência informacional. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, DF, v. 40 n. 1, p. 99-110, jan./abr. 2011. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v40n1/a08v40n1.pdf. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2023.

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Lima, T. A. de, Furnival , A. C. M., Casarin, H. de C. S., & Pagán Martínez, M. (2024). Information literacy in academic writing to avoid plagiarism: a study in students of higher education at brazilian universities. Informação & Informação, 28(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n3p255