Aplicação da governança do conhecimento em organizações do setor público e privado: uma revisão integrativa acerca das diferenças e similaridades

Amanda Soares; Ivânia Freire da Silva; Patrícia de Sá Freire

doi:10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n1p79

Authors

Amanda Soares Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0331-389X
Ivânia Freire da Silva Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso - UFMT https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-2636
Patrícia de Sá Freire Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n1p79

Keywords:

Corporate governance, Knowledge management, Literature reviews

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to identify differences and similarities in the application of Knowledge Governance (GovC) in public and private sector organizations.
Methodology: This research can be characterized as qualitative, theoretical, exploratory and descriptive. The method used for its execution was the integrative literature review, applying the thematic analysis strategy. The planned, systematic and explicit survey of the data was carried out in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The searches took place in April 2021. Based on a group resulting from the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 7 scientific articles were analyzed and their arguments served as the basis for identifying differences and similarities in the application of the GovC and how it occurs in public and private.
Results: GovC structures tend to be more present in public organizations due to issues related to legislation and strategies specific to this context. The structuring and analysis of the formal mechanisms of the GovC from a holistic view promote the achievement of the objective that public and private organizations have in common in providing services to society. Hierarchization and decentralization can influence social interactions that promote knowledge-sharing behavior in public and private organizations.
Conclusions: As contributions, we highlight the possibility of visualizing the practical application of GovC in organizations and stimulating reflection and deepening of differences and similarities in the public and private sectors, which despite having different contexts, are complementary in several aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Amanda Soares, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

Graduated in Library Science from the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brasil.

Ivânia Freire da Silva, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso - UFMT

PhD student in Engineering and Knowledge Management at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professor of the Administration course at the Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso (UFMT), Rondonópolis, Brasil.

Patrícia de Sá Freire, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

PhD in Engineering and Knowledge Management from the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Engineering and Knowledge Management at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brasil.

References

ABBASI, S. G.; ALAGHBARI, M. A.; SHABBIR, M. S.; ABBAS, M. Organizational Culture and Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Moderated Mediation Model. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, Maracaibo, ano 25, n. extra 10, p. 480-489, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4155773. Disponível em: https://zenodo.org/records/4155773. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021.

ALI, I.; MUSAWIR, A. U.; ALI, M. Impact of knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity on project performance: the moderating role of social processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 453-477, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0449. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0449/full/html. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0449

ANDRADE HORA, R. A. A.; OLIVEIRA, O. V.; FORTE, S. H. A. C. Governança corporativa no setor público e privado no contexto brasileiro: a produção e evolução acadêmica em dez anos de contribuições. In: SIMPÓSIO DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA (SEGeT), 11., 2014, Rio de Janeiro. Anais [...]. Rio de Janeiro: 2014, p. 1-16. Disponível em: https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos14/47120562.pdf. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021.

ANTONELLI, C. The business governance of localized knowledge: An information economics approach for the economics of knowledge. Industry and Innovation, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 227-261, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710600858118. Disponível em: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710600858118

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13662710600858118. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021.

ARGOTE, L.; INGRAM, P. Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, [S. l.], v. 82, n. 1, p. 150-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597800928930?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893

AYRESS, L. Thematic coding and analysis. In: GIVEN, L. M. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc., 2008. p. 867-868.

BOYNE, G. A. Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference? Journal of Management Studies, [S. l.], v. 39, n. 1, p. 97-122, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6486.00284. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284

BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Thematic Analysis. In: COOPER, H.; CAMIC, P. M.; LONG, D. L.; PANTER, A. T.; RINDSKOPF, D.; SHER, K. J. (ed.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2012, p. 57-71. v. 2.

BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. O modelo estrutural de gerência pública. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 42, n. 2, p. 391-412, 2008. Disponível em: https://hml-bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/6638. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122008000200009

BURLAMAQUI, L. Knowledge governance, innovation and development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 4, p. 560-580, Oct. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572010000400002. Disponível em: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572010000400002

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000400002&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021.

CAMARGO, E. J. B.; PEREIRA, A. S. A gestão do conhecimento no setor público: seus conceitos, modelos e ferramentas. Revista Teoria e Evidência Econômica, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 48, 2017. DOI: 10.5335/rtee.v23i48.7364. Disponível em: https://seer.upf.br/index.php/rtee/article/view/7364. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5335/rtee.v23i48.7364

COSTA, I.; VASCONCELOS, A. C. F.; CÂNDIDO, G. A. Diagnóstico de Gestão do Conhecimento como Mecanismo Para Criação De Valor: Um Estudo Exploratório No SEBRAE-PB. Revista Gestão Industrial, Ponta Grossa, v. 5, n. 2, p. 80-98, 2009. DOI: 10.3895/S1808-04482009000200005. Disponível em: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/revistagi/article/view/346. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482009000200005

DALKIR, K. Knowledge management in theory and practice. Oxford: Elsevier, 2005.

EVANS, M. M.; DALKIR, K.; BIDIAN, C. A. Holistic View of the Knowledge Life Cycle: the knowledge management cycle (KMC) model. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 85-97. Disponível em: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/1015. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021.

FOSS, N. J. Knowledge Governance: meaning, nature, origins, and implications. [S. l.]: 2011. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1969400#paper-references-widget. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1969400

FOSS, N. J.; MAHONEY, J. T.; PABLOS, P. Knowledge governance: contributions and unresolved issues. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 4, p. 263-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCM.2010.035846. Disponível em: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJSCM.2010.035846. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCM.2010.035846

FREIRE, P. S.; DANDOLINI, G. A.; SOUZA, J. A.; SILVA, T. C.; COUTO, R. M. Governança do Conhecimento (GovC): o estado da arte sobre o termo. Biblios Revista de Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Informacíon, [S. l.], n. 69, p. 21-40, 2018. DOI: 10.5195/biblios.2017.469. Disponível em: http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/biblios/article/view/469. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2017.469

GERRITSEN, A. L.; STUIVER, M.; TERMEER, C. J. A. M. Knowledge governance: An exploration of principles, impact, and barriers. Science and Public Policy, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 5, p. 604-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct012. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-abstract/40/5/604/1674954?redirectedFrom=fulltext. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct012

GIEBELS, D.; VAN BUUREN, A.; EDELENBOS, J. Knowledge governance for ecosystem-based management: Understanding its context-dependency. Environmental Science & Policy, [S. l.], v. 55, n. 3, p. 424-435, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.019. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1462901115300721?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.019

GIL, A. C. Como classificar as pesquisas. In: GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002, p. 41-58. Cap. 4.

GOLDMAN, F. L. Governança do Conhecimento e Gestão do Conhecimento Organizacional: Antagônicas ou Complementares? Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, Pedro Leopoldo, v. 10, n. 1, p.1-12, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2010.v10i1.56. Disponível em: http://revistagt.fpl.emnuvens.com.br/get/article/view/56/68. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021.

GRANDORI, A. Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models. Journal of Management and Governance, [S. l.], v. 1, p. 29-47, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977627870. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009977627870#citeas. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977627870

GRANDORI, A. Neither hierarchy nor identity: Knowledge governance mechanisms and theory of the firm. Journal of Management & Governance, [S. l.], v. 5, p. 381-399, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014055213456. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1014055213456#citeas. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014055213456

HUSTED, K.; MICHAILOVA, S.; MINBAEVA, D. B.; PEDERSEN, T. Knowledge-sharing hostility and governance mechanisms: an empirical test. Journal of Knowledge Management, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 5, p. 754-773, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262790. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13673271211262790/full/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262790

IGBINOVIA, M. O.; IKENWE, I. J. Knowledge Management: Processes and Systems. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 26-38, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/iijikm.v8i3.3. Disponível: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/iijikm/article/view/167179. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/iijikm.v8i3.3

JURKIEWICZ, C. L.; MASSEY, T. K.; BROWN, R. G. Motivation in Public and Private Organizations: A Comparative Study. Public Productivity & Management Review, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 3, p. 230-250, Mar. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3380856

LAIHONEN, H.; KOKKO, P. Knowledge management and hybridity of institutional logics in public sector. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 1, p. 14-28, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1788429. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14778238.2020.1788429. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1788429

LIN, X. Review of Knowledge and Knowledge Management Research. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, [S. l.], v. 9, p. 1753-1760, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.99114. Disponível em: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=94749. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.99114

MENEZES, E. M. Pesquisa bibliográfica. Florianópolis: CIN/CED/UFSC, 2009.

NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1998.

NOOTEBOOM, B. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, [S. l.], v. 4, p. 69-92, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009941416749

NUTT, P. C. Comparing Public and Private Sector Decision-Making Practices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 289-318, Apr. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui041. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/16/2/289/908278. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui041

PERRY, J. L.; RAINEY, H. G. The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy. Academy of Management Review, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 182-201, Apr. 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/258571?origin=crossref. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858

RAHMAN, A.; KHANDAKER, S. Public and Private Organizations: How Different or Similar are They. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, [S. l.], v. 12, p. 2873-2885, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-12-2873-2885

RAINEY, H. G.; BOZEMAN, B. Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 447-470, Apr. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/10/2/447/987743. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276

REIS, A.; GIACOMINI FILHO, G. Indicadores de responsabilidade social: estudo comparativo entre empresas públicas e privadas, baseado no balanço social IBASE. Revista de Ciências da Administração, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 22, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2008v10n22p170

RICHARDSON, R. J. Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012.

RUS, M.; RUSU, D. C. The Organizational Culture in Public and Private Institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, [S. l.], v. 187, n. 13, p. 565-569, May 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.105. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815018984?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.105

SANZ-IBANEZ, C.; LOZANO, S.; CLAVE, S. A. Brokers in a destination's knowledge networks. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, [S. l.], n. 11, p. 120-129, Mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.01.001. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212571X18303354?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.01.001

SILVA, E. L.; MENEZES, E. M. Metodologia da pesquisa e elaboração de dissertação. Florianópolis: UFSC, 2005.

TORRACO, R. J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 356-367, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1534484305278283. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

WHITTEMORE, R.; KNAFL, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of advanced nursing, [S. l.], v. 52, n. 5, p. 546-553, Dec. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16268861/. Acesso em: 23 maio 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x