The presence of brazilian scientific production in the knowledge organization journal on 21st century

Authors

  • Manoela Ferreira da Silva Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
  • Isadora Victorino Evangelista Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4682-9813
  • José Augusto Chaves Guimarães Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p28

Keywords:

Domain Analysis, Epistemic Communities, Brazilian Scientific Production, Knowledge Organization

Abstract

Introduction: The Knowledge Organization journal is today one of the main vehicles of scientific communication with regard to Knowledge Organization (OC) issues. Objetive: Thus, it was considered relevant to analyze how the Brazilian context is presented in these communications, verifying which authors and institutions are most productive, as well as frequency of publications, national coauthors and international collaborations. Methodology: Through the analysis of the numbers published in the period 2001-2018, it was possible to identify a strong presence of articles of Brazilian authorship, with a total of 51 productions. Results: Was found a community led by Professors José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Daniel Martínez-Ávila, Fábio de Assis Pinho and Renato Rocha de Souza, who are responsible for 28% of all publications in this period, was also noticed. The most productive institutions are the Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP and the Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, institutions that had at least one author affiliated in half of the institutional implications. There is also a strong growth in the number of articles in the most recent years, especially in 2012 and 2014 onwards, responsible for almost 85% of the total number of Brazilian publications in the journal. Relative to national coauthories, a strong group was noticed worried about the ethical and social questions in knowledge organization, studies in documentary languages, aspects relative to information retrieval, semantic web, ontologies, beside others. Regarding international co-authoring, emphasis is placed on thematic interest groups, such as ethical and social dimensions, bibliometric aspects, interlocution with the exact sciences and technologies, among others. Conclusions: The leadership of the group of authors confirms that the journal is open on topics such as ethical and social aspects of OC, as well as technological perspectives in the context of this domain. In addition, a strong incidence of affiliated articles between UNESP and UFMG has revealed a specificity and a research tradition of these two universities on which knowledge organization is based.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Manoela Ferreira da Silva, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

Graduada em Biblioteconomia pela Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP.

Isadora Victorino Evangelista, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

Doutoranda em Ciência da Informação pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação da Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP.

José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

Professor Titular do Departamento de Ciência da Informação da Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

References

ADLER, Emanuel. The emergence of cooperation: national epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control. International Organization, v. 46, n. 1, 1992, p. 101-145.

GRACIO, Maria Cláudia Cabrini; OLIVEIRA, Ely Francina Tannuri de. Produção e comunicação da informação em CT&I - GT7 da ANCIB: análise bibliométrica no período 2003/2009. Liinc em Revista, Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 1, mar. 2011, p. 248-263.

GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves; TOGNOLI, Natália Bolfarini. Provenance as a domain analysis approach in archival knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, v. 42, n. 8, 2015, p. 562-569.

HAAS, Peter M. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, Cambridge, v. 46, n. 1, p. 01-35, 1992.

HJøRLAND, Birger; ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 46, n. 6, 1995, p. 400-425.

HJøRLAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information Science: eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, v. 58, n. 4, 2002, p. 422-462.

MOYA-ANEGÓN, Felix de; HERRERO-SOLANO, Víctor. Análisis de dominio de la revista mexicana de investigación bibliotecológica. Información, cultura y sociedad, v. 5, 2001, p. 10-28.

SMIRAGLIA, Richard P. Epistemology of Domain Analysis. In: LEE, H-L.; SMIRAGLIA, R.P. (ed.). Cultural frames of knowledge. Wurzburg: Ergon, 2012. p.111-124.

TENNIS, Joseph T. Two Axes of Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization, v. 30, n. 3/4, 2003, p. 191-195.

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Silva, M. F. da, Evangelista, I. V., & Guimarães, J. A. C. (2019). The presence of brazilian scientific production in the knowledge organization journal on 21st century. Informação & Informação, 24(3), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p28

Issue

Section

Dossiê Temático