Conceptual and empirical differences between adaptive efficacy and coping
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-6407.2016v7n1p02Keywords:
scaling (testing), psychological assessment, coping behavior, college students, young adultsAbstract
In this research, measures of adaptive efficacy and coping are compared with the aim of examining the extent to which they reflect similar aspects of the general functioning of individuals. The sample consisted of 103 undergraduate students, aged between 17 and 44 years (21.67 ± 4.78; 83.5% women). The instruments were The Escala Diagnóstica Adaptativa Operacionalizada de Autorrelato (EDAO-AR) and the Coping Response Inventory - Adult Form (CRI-A). We used t-test for independent samples and Pearson correlation for data analysis. Significant higher scores for women were observed only for coping strategy "emotional discharge” (t(97)=0.930, p=0.2, d= 0.2). Although the EDAO-AR and the CRI-A keep with each other some degree of association and theoretical overlap, the results indicated that the constructs of adaptive efficacy and coping focuses on different aspects of human activities. Limitations of the research and new perspectives are discussed.Downloads
References
Aldwin, C. (1994). Stress, coping and development: An integrative perspective. New York London: The Guilford Press.
Aldwin, C., & Revenson, T. (1997). Does coping help? A re-examination of the relation between coping and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 337-348.
Folkman, S. (Ed.) (2011). The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping. New York: Oxford University Press.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219-239.
Kirchner, T., Forns, M., Muñoz, D., & Pereda, N. (2008). Psychometric properties and dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the Coping Responses Inventory - Adult Form. Psicothema, 20(4), 902-909.
Kohli, S., Batra, P., & Aggarwal, H., K. (2011). Anxiety, locus of control, and coping strategies among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Indian Journal of Nephrology, 21(3), 177-181.
Laloni, D. T. (2001). Escala de Avaliação de Sintomas-90-R-SCL-90-R: adaptação, precisão e validade. Tese de Doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Disponível em: http://www.bibliotecadigital.puccampinas.edu.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=294
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer, 1984.
Moos, R. H. (1993). Coping Response Inventory Youth Form: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Norcross, J. C. (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-Based Responsiveness (2ª ed.) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Paula Junior, W., & Zanini, D. S. (2011). Estratégias de coping de pacientes oncológicos em tratamento radioterápico. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 27(4), 491-497. doi: 10.1590/S0102-37722011000400013
Pretorius, C., Walker, S.P. & Esterhuyse, K.G.F. (2010). Coping responses as predictors of satisfaction with life amongst a group of patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, Health SA Gesondheid, 15(1). doi: 10.4102/hsag.v15i1.513
Santeiro, F. R. M., Zanini, D. S., & Santeiro, T. V. S. (2013). Análise empírica de tendências na produção científica sobre coping (SciELO, 1993/2012) (manuscrito submetido).
Simon, R. (1989). Psicologia clínica preventiva: Novos fundamentos. São Paulo: EPU. (Original publicado em 1983: Vetor)
Simon, R. (1997). Proposta de redefinição da Escala Diagnóstica Adaptativa Operacionalizada. Boletim de Psicologia, 47(107), 85-93.
Simon, R. (2005). Psicoterapia breve operacionalizada: Teoria e técnica. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
Schinke, R.J., Battochio, R.C., Lidor, R., Tenenbaum, G., Dube, T.V., & Lane, A.M. (2012). Adaptation processes affecting performance in elite sport. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 6, 180–195.
Schinke, R.J., Tenenbaum, G., Lidor, R., & Battochio, R.C. (2010). Adaptation in action: the transition from research to intervention. The Sport Psychologist, 24, 542–557.
Vaillant, G.E. (2002). Aging well. Boston: Little, Brown & Company. Yoshida, E. M. P. (2012). Escala Diagnóstica Adaptativa Operacionalizada de Auto-Relato (EDAO-AR) (2ª versão). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (manuscrito).
Yoshida, E. M. P. (2013). Escala Diagnóstica Adaptativa Operacionalizada de Autorrelato - EDAO-AR: Evidências de validade. Paidéia, 23(54), 83-91. doi: 10.1590/1982-43272354201310
Yoshida, E. M. P., Enéas, M. L. E., & Santeiro, T. V. (2010). Escala Diagnóstica Adaptativa Operacionalizada (EDAO): Avaliação da qualidade da eficácia adaptativa. In A. A. A. Santos, F. F. Sisto, E. Boruchovitch & E. Nascimento (Eds.), Perspectivas em avaliação psicológica (pp. 211-228). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
Zanini, D. S., Forns, M., & Kirchner, T. (2005). Coping response and problem appraisal in Spanish adolescent. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 153-166.
Zanini, D., & Queiroz, I. P. (2011). Apoio social, coping e suas repercussões no humor depressivo. Estudos, 38(1/3), 133-149.
Zanini, D.S., Mendonça, Forns, M., & Kirchner, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Coping Response Inventory with brazilian adolescentes. Psychological Reports, 107, 617-628. doi: 10.2466/08.17.20.PR0.107.5.617-628
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Copyright of the published manuscripts belongs to the Journal. Since they are published in an open access Journal, they are freely available, for private use or for use for educational and non-commercial purposes.
The Journal has the right to make, in the original document, changes regarding linguistic norms, orthography, and grammar, with the purpose of ensuring the standard norms of the language and the credibility of the Journal. It will, however, respect the writing style of the authors.
When necessary, conceptual changes, corrections, or suggestions will be forwarded to the authors. In such cases, the manuscript shall be subjected to a new evaluation after revision.
Responsibility for the opinions expressed in the manuscripts lies entirely with the authors.