Early delivery of anencephalic fetus based on personality rights and constitutional principles

Authors

  • Maira Priscinotti Sahao Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Martha Asuncion Enriquez Prado Universidade Estadual de Londrina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0383.2009v30n2p159

Keywords:

Fetal Anencephaly, Personality Rights, Constitutional Principles, Delivery Anticipation, Allegation of Breach of Fundamental Precept.

Abstract

This paper discusses the study of early delivery of anencephalic fetus. It is based on the Allegation of Breach of Fundamental Precept No. 54, which seeks to legalize this. Furthermore, it discusses the conduct of pregnant women, and argues that this procedure is considered atypical: these cases would not qualify as abortion, because for fetuses with this anomaly there is no expectation of extra-uterine life. However, it emphasizes the autonomy of the pregnant woman charging her for deciding on the anticipation or not of childbirth. The analyses of this study are based on personality rights and constitutional principles, both in relation to the fetus, as compared to the women. It also discusses the issue of abortion in Brazil and clarifies the concept of anencephaly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maira Priscinotti Sahao, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Pós graduanda em Direito do Estado com ênfase em Direito Tributário pela Universidade Estadual de Londrina e pós graduanda em Direito pela Fundação Escola do Ministério Público do Estado do Paraná

Martha Asuncion Enriquez Prado, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Pós Doutora em Direito pela Universidad Complutense de Madrid, U.C.M. Espanha; professora-associada da graduação e mestrado em Direito na Universidade Estadual de Londrina.

Published

2011-03-14

How to Cite

SAHAO, Maira Priscinotti; ENRIQUEZ PRADO, Martha Asuncion. Early delivery of anencephalic fetus based on personality rights and constitutional principles. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 159–176, 2011. DOI: 10.5433/1679-0383.2009v30n2p159. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminasoc/article/view/3667. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos Seção Livre

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.