The comparison between two parasitological techniques for the detection of enteroparasites in waste pickers from the south of Brazil

Authors

  • Juliana Carriconde Hernandes Universidade Federal de Pelotas http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-8308
  • Érico Kunde Corrêa Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Luciara Bilhalva Corrêa Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Denise Gamio Dias Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Bruna Baccega Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Andréia Saggin Nagel Universidade Federal de pelotas
  • Ana Lúcia Coelho Recuero Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Claudiomar Soares Brod Universidade Federal de Pelotas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0367.2018v39n1p29

Keywords:

Parasites, Public Health, Recycling.

Abstract

Some researchers and clinical laboratories use just one technique for the detection of enteroparasites, allowing substandard findings. Enteroparasites mostly affect the socially vulnerable population, like the waste pickers. Some of these workers are gathered in cooperatives where work conditions and monthly wage are better. However, this environment is still not adequate being, sometimes, unsanitary. The objective was to study the enteroparasite prevalence and compare the two parasitological techniques in their effect measure in recyclable waste picker who were working in cooperatives in the south of Brazil. Three stool samples from 48 pickers from six cooperatives were collected in alternate days for parasite analysis. Two sample concentration techniques were used (Faust and Ritchie) and tested to verify which was the best to use. The parasite prevalence in waste picker was 62.5% (30/48), using the two techniques concurrently. When used individually, the prevalence was lower. Commensal and pathogenic helminths and protozoan were diagnosed. From the statistical analysis, it was proved that the parasitological techniques provide better results when used concomitantly, that is, when using the two techniques at the same time in three stool samples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juliana Carriconde Hernandes, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD in Parasitology from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Érico Kunde Corrêa, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD in Biotechnology from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Adjunct Professor of the Engineering Center, Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Luciara Bilhalva Corrêa, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD in Environmental Education, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Adjunct Professor of the Engineering Center, Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Denise Gamio Dias, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD in Education from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Bruna Baccega, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD student in Parasitology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Andréia Saggin Nagel, Universidade Federal de pelotas

Master in Parasitology from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Ana Lúcia Coelho Recuero, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD in Veterinary Medicine from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Claudiomar Soares Brod, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

PhD in Biotechnology from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Full professor at the Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Published

2018-07-04

How to Cite

1.
Carriconde Hernandes J, Corrêa Érico K, Corrêa LB, Dias DG, Baccega B, Nagel AS, et al. The comparison between two parasitological techniques for the detection of enteroparasites in waste pickers from the south of Brazil. Semin. Cienc. Biol. Saude [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 4 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];39(1):29-40. Available from: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminabio/article/view/30573

Issue

Section

Artigos