Genetic divergence in maize growing at first and second season
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p449Keywords:
Zea mays L., Heterotic group, UPGMA, Inbred lines extraction.Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate the genetic divergence among 19 corn hybrids growing at the summer and “safrinha” season. Two experiments were carried out in Rio Verde, Goias, in the 2007/2008 and 2008/2008 season. Both experiments were conducted at reduced spacing of 0.5 m, with population density of about 65,000 plants per hectare at summer and “safrinha” season respectively, using a randomized block design with three replications. Were evaluated the following characters: plant height, ear height, length of tassel, leaf area index, number of kernels rows per ear, number of kernels per row, thousand grain weight and grain yield. The genetic divergence was estimated from Mahalanobis dissimilarity and the hybrids were grouped by the methods of Tocher and non-weighted arithmetic averages (UPGMA). The results show greater genetic divergence between hybrids 2A525 and DKB177 and between P30K64 and DKB177 at the summer and “safrinha” season respectively. The indexes of dissimilarity observed in both seasons suggest the achieving of greater heterosis by crossing lines from the hybrids AG8060, P30F35, 2B587, AG7088 and DKB390 with lines from the hybrids AG7000 and DKB177.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.