Temperature, giberelic acid and light action in fafia seeds germination – Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) Pedersen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n3p349Keywords:
Germination, Gibberelin, Medicinal plants.Abstract
Pfaffia glomerata Spreng. Pedersen (fafia) is a vegetal specie with medical interest. A randomized experiment was used to study the effects of gibberelic acid, light/darkness and pre-freezing on the germination of fafia seeds (Pfaffia glomerata Spreng. Pedersen). The experiment had five replications of 40 seeds, with the following treatments: control, GA3 100 ppm, GA3 200 ppm, darkness and destilated water, GA3 100 and 200 ppm and 48 h pre-freezing and GA3 100 and 200 ppm and 7 days of pre-freezing. The fafia seeds were presoaked during 18 hours in GA3 and destilated water solutions, and thereafter placed in gerbox, using moistened filter paper. In the pre-freezing treatments the seeds were kept in a refrigerator for 48 hours and thereafter 7 days in 5° C ± 1. After this they were transfered to a cultive room with continuous white light and constant temperature of 22°C ± 2. Seed counting was performed each 3 days until 30 days. To evaluate the treatment effects, seeds were submitted to observations of percentage of germinated seeds, and the average period of germination, expressed in days. The GA3 treatments didn’t increase the germination and the pre-freezing treatment reduced significatively the germination percentage, and delayed this process.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O Copyright dos manuscritos publicados pertence ao periódico. Como são publicados em um periódico de acesso aberto, eles estão disponíveis gratuitamente, para uso privado ou para fins educacionais e não comerciais.
A revista tem o direito de fazer, no documento original, alterações referentes às normas lingüísticas, ortografia e gramática, com o objetivo de garantir as normas padrão do idioma e a credibilidade da revista. No entanto, respeitará o estilo de escrita dos autores.
Quando necessário, alterações conceituais, correções ou sugestões serão encaminhadas aos autores. Nesses casos, o manuscrito deve ser submetido a uma nova avaliação após revisão.
A responsabilidade pelas opiniões expressas nos manuscritos é inteiramente dos autores.