Artificial Intelligence, algorithms and the impact of new technologies on the legal processes of the information society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n1p151Keywords:
artificial intelligence, algorithms, new technologies, court lawsuits, information society.Abstract
This article analyzes the scenario of technological revolution concentrated in information and communication technologies that remodeled the material base of society at an accelerated pace, from the end of the 20th century, but especially the effects of algorithms and Artificial Intelligences, in technological applications of the legal system, especially with regard to its use by the Judiciary, since from the 1990s onwards, when the internet became popular and there was a vertiginous and progressive increase in the number of claims in process, which it ends up resulting in delays in processing and judging such demands. For this reason, in order to overcome this challenging reality resulting from the progressive growth in the volume of lawsuits in progress, a critical scenario that affects the Brazilian Judiciary, it has pondered and sought out the most diverse solutions. This is how the use of information technologies, especially algorithms and Artificial Intelligences for the law (currently called "Lawtechs"), has been considered and carried out in the Judiciary, as a technological alternative to assist in matters pertaining to the judicial system.References
ANGWIN, Julia et al. Machine Bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica, 23 maio 2016. Disponível em: [www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing]. Acesso em: 06.06.2019.
ARTERO, Almir Olivette. Inteligência artificial: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2009. p. 121-152.
BARRETO JUNIOR, Irineu Francisco. Atualidade do Conceito Sociedade da Informação para a Pesquisa Jurídica. In: PAESANI, Liliana Minardi (coord.). Direito na Sociedade da Informação. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007, p.62.
BARRETO JUNIOR, Irineu Francisco; PELLIZZARI, Bruno Henrique Miniuchi. Bolhas Sociais e seus Efeitos na Sociedade da Informação: Ditadura do Algoritmo e Entropia na Internet. Revista de Direito, Governança e Novas Tecnologias | e-ISSN: 2526-0049 | Belém | v. 5 | n. 2 | p. 57 - 73 | Jul/Dez. 2019.
BOURCIER, Danièle. Inteligencia artificial y derecho. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, 2003. E-book. p. 165-168.
NIEVA FENOLL, Jordi. Inteligencia artificial y proceso judicial. Madri: Marcial Pons, 2018. p. 17-34.
HARARI, Yuval Noah. 21 Lições para o Século 21. Trad. Paulo Geiger. E-book. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2018, p. 28-31.
MARANHÃO, Juliano. A pesquisa em inteligência artificial e Direito no Brasil. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2017-dez-09/juliano-maranhao-pesquisa-inteligencia-artificial-direito-pais. Acesso em: 09. Dez. 2017.
MARTINS, João Paulo Nery dos Passos. Inteligência artificial aplicada à atividade jurisdicional. Orientador: José Miguel Garcia Medina. 2020, 144 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Processual e Cidadania) – Universidade Paranaense – UNIPAR, Umuarama, 2020, p. 31, 50 e 55.
MCCARTHY, John et al. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, v. 27, n. 4, p. 12-14, 2006. Disponível em: [www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/view/1904/1802]. Acesso em: 27.09.2019. p. 12-14.
O’NEIL, athy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group’s, 2016.
PROPUBLICA. Machine Bias – There´s Software Used across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it´s Biased Against Black. Disponível em: [www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing] Acesso em 10.09.2020.
SCHWAB, Klaus. A quarta revolução industrial. Trad. Daniel Moreira Miranda. E-book. São Paulo: Edipro, 2019.
SOURDIN, Tania. Judge v. Robot? Artificial Intelligence and judicial decision-making. University of New South Wales Law Journal, v. 41, p. 114-1133, 2018. Disponível em: [www8.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2018/38.pdf]. Acesso em: 18.10.2020. p. 1117, 1123 e 1124.
TACCA, Adriano; ROCHA, Leonel Severo. Inteligência artificial: reflexos no sistema do Direito. Revista do Programa e Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFC, v. 38.2, p. 53-68, jul.-dez. 2018. Disponível em: [www.periodicos.ufc.br/nomos/article/view/20493/95963]. Acesso em: 04.02.2019. p. 60.
ARTERO, Almir Olivette. Inteligência artificial: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2009. p. 121-152.
BARRETO JUNIOR, Irineu Francisco. Atualidade do Conceito Sociedade da Informação para a Pesquisa Jurídica. In: PAESANI, Liliana Minardi (coord.). Direito na Sociedade da Informação. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007, p.62.
BARRETO JUNIOR, Irineu Francisco; PELLIZZARI, Bruno Henrique Miniuchi. Bolhas Sociais e seus Efeitos na Sociedade da Informação: Ditadura do Algoritmo e Entropia na Internet. Revista de Direito, Governança e Novas Tecnologias | e-ISSN: 2526-0049 | Belém | v. 5 | n. 2 | p. 57 - 73 | Jul/Dez. 2019.
BOURCIER, Danièle. Inteligencia artificial y derecho. Barcelona: Editorial UOC, 2003. E-book. p. 165-168.
NIEVA FENOLL, Jordi. Inteligencia artificial y proceso judicial. Madri: Marcial Pons, 2018. p. 17-34.
HARARI, Yuval Noah. 21 Lições para o Século 21. Trad. Paulo Geiger. E-book. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2018, p. 28-31.
MARANHÃO, Juliano. A pesquisa em inteligência artificial e Direito no Brasil. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2017-dez-09/juliano-maranhao-pesquisa-inteligencia-artificial-direito-pais. Acesso em: 09. Dez. 2017.
MARTINS, João Paulo Nery dos Passos. Inteligência artificial aplicada à atividade jurisdicional. Orientador: José Miguel Garcia Medina. 2020, 144 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Processual e Cidadania) – Universidade Paranaense – UNIPAR, Umuarama, 2020, p. 31, 50 e 55.
MCCARTHY, John et al. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, v. 27, n. 4, p. 12-14, 2006. Disponível em: [www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/view/1904/1802]. Acesso em: 27.09.2019. p. 12-14.
O’NEIL, athy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group’s, 2016.
PROPUBLICA. Machine Bias – There´s Software Used across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it´s Biased Against Black. Disponível em: [www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing] Acesso em 10.09.2020.
SCHWAB, Klaus. A quarta revolução industrial. Trad. Daniel Moreira Miranda. E-book. São Paulo: Edipro, 2019.
SOURDIN, Tania. Judge v. Robot? Artificial Intelligence and judicial decision-making. University of New South Wales Law Journal, v. 41, p. 114-1133, 2018. Disponível em: [www8.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2018/38.pdf]. Acesso em: 18.10.2020. p. 1117, 1123 e 1124.
TACCA, Adriano; ROCHA, Leonel Severo. Inteligência artificial: reflexos no sistema do Direito. Revista do Programa e Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFC, v. 38.2, p. 53-68, jul.-dez. 2018. Disponível em: [www.periodicos.ufc.br/nomos/article/view/20493/95963]. Acesso em: 04.02.2019. p. 60.
Downloads
Published
2022-03-31
How to Cite
Fujita, J. S., & Pedrosa, J. M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, algorithms and the impact of new technologies on the legal processes of the information society. Scientia Iuris, 26(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n1p151
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal’s articles are of their sole responsibility.
