SYSTEMIC INTERPRETATION AND THE JUDICIAL RECOVERY OF THE POSSIBILITY FOR COMPANIES IN COMMON

Authors

  • Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos Costa
  • Marlene Kempfer UEL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p125

Keywords:

Systemic Analysis, Enterprise Recovery Company in Common

Abstract

The Company in common was introduced by Brazilian law from the Civil Code of 2002 in its articles 986 to 990. In the previous period it was analyzed from the irregular company name or company and fact. The first was characterized by having written contract, but this was not brought to registration with the competent body and the second when there was no social contract. This study aims to analyze the figure of the Company in common, in the current legal system, from the majority interpretation that does not recognize the right to judicial recovery. It points out that this interpretation ignores: i) principles governing the legal system and the economic subsystem; and ii) that the current legislation allows their accountability before legal duties in labor spheres, tax, competitive and consumer. Under these main arguments is that they have highlighted the systematic interpretation to defend the right to judicial or extrajudicial recovery. So effective is legal certainty material.    Arraste e solte o arquivo ou link aqui para traduzir o documento ou a página da Web.Arraste e solte o link aqui para traduzir a página da Web.O tipo de arquivo que você soltou não é suportado. Tente outros tipos de arquivo.O tipo de link que você soltou não é suportado. Tente outros tipos de link. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Juliana Hinterlang dos Santos Costa

Master of Negotiation Law from the State University of Londrina.

Marlene Kempfer, UEL

PhD in Law from the Catholic University of Sao Paulo.

Published

2015-06-08

How to Cite

Costa, J. H. dos S., & Kempfer, M. (2015). SYSTEMIC INTERPRETATION AND THE JUDICIAL RECOVERY OF THE POSSIBILITY FOR COMPANIES IN COMMON. Scientia Iuris, 19(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p125

Issue

Section

Artigos