Students in science

the scientific production of graduate women at UFAM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2022v27n3p158

Keywords:

Women in Science, Metric studies, Students, Scientific production

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recent advances in relation to the female presence in science, there is a disparity between genders in relation to scientific production and careers in the area, which instigates reflection on the demand for stimuli and incentives aimed at women and girls who aspire to become researchers.
Objective: To identify the scientific production of UFAM graduate students, characterizing the importance and role of women in science, as well as mapping the scientific production and presenting an overview of the period from 2018 to 2020.
Methodology: Establishes the approach as a method quantitative that aims to measure the scientific production of women and as a technical procedure bibliographical research, in addition to the use of metric studies of information through bibliometric analysis to analyze the students' work.
Results: During the pandemic, it is possible to observe that there is a sharp decline in the production of these students, as well as a large number of scientific productions with the themes of health and education.
Conclusions: It is necessary for society to embrace new strategies to achieve this female empowerment and encourage students to carry out scientific production, which is just the first step towards achieving equality and seeking solutions to transform the scientific community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Celia Regina Simonetti Barbalho, Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM

PhD in Communication and Semiotics from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC/SP). Docente da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Brasil.

Yasmin Martins Gomes, Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM

Graduated in Librarianship from the Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Brasil.

References

CHASSOT, Attico. A ciência é masculina? É, sim senhora! Revista Contexto & Educação, Ijuí, v. 19, n. 71-72, p. 9-28, 2004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21527/2179-1309.2004.71-72.9-28. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2021.

DROESCHER, Fernanda Dias; SILVA, Edna Lucia da. O pesquisador e a produção científica. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 19, n. 1, p. 170-189, mar. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-99362014000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362014000100011

ELSEVIER. Gender in the global research landscape report. Amsterdã: Elsevier B. V., 2017. 96 p. Disponível em: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/265661/ElsevierGenderReport_final_fo r-web.pdf. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2020.

INSTITUTO LEGADO DE EMPREENDEDORISMO SOCIAL. 11 de fevereiro: o Dia Internacional das Mulheres e das Meninas na Ciência. Curitiba: [s.n.], 2000. Disponível em: https://institutolegado.org/blog/11-de-fevereiro-o-dia-internacional-das-mulheres-e-das- meninas-na- ciencia/?gclid=CjwKCAiA0KmPBhBqEiwAJqKK4362gx8sW9aCf7N_GAFdAEkkSCqKZN Gd7qdmHVRIrqflEbLH2UuychoCogsQAvD_BwE. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2022

LETA, Jacqueline. As mulheres na ciência brasileira: crescimento, contrastes e um perfil de sucesso. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 17, n. 49, p. 271-284, dez. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142003000300016&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142003000300016

MATTHEWS, David. Pandemic lockdown holding back female academics: data show. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/pandemic-lockdown-holding-back-female-academics-data-show. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2022

NEGRI, Fernanda de. Women in science: still invisible? In: PRUSA, Anna; PICANÇO, Lara. A snapshot of the status of women in Brazil: 2019. Washington, Dc: Wilson Center, 2019. Cap. 6. p. 20-24. Disponível em: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/status_of_wom en_in_brazil_2019_final.pdf. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2020.

PARENT IN SCIENCE. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Produtividade acadêmica durante a pandemia: efeitos de gênero, raça e parentalidade. Porto Alegre: Parent In Science, 2020. 13 slides, color. Disponível em: https://www.ufrgs.br/ciencia/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/LevantamentoParentinSciencePandemia.pdf. Acesso em: 21 jan. 2022.

RIGOLIN, Camila Carneiro Dias; HAYASHI, Carlos Roberto Massao; HAYASHI, Maria Cristina PiumbatoInnocentini. Métricas da participação feminina na ciência e tecnologia no contexto dos Incts: primeiras aproximações. Liinc em Revista, Rio de Janeiro, v. 9, n. 1, p. 143-170, 2013. Disponível em: http://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/3400. Acesso em 27 jun. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v9i1.524

SCHIEBINGER, Londa. Mais mulheres na ciência: questões de conhecimento. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v. 15, supl. p. 269-281, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/hcsm/a/LZcRqYbsQR4cxYkgfCGyjyr/?lang=pt. Acesso em 13 jan. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702008000500015

SCHIEBINGER, Londa. O feminismo mudou a ciência? Bauru: EDUSC, 2001. 384 p. Disponível em: https://bibliotecaonlinedahisfj.wordpress.com/2015/03/04/o-feminismo-mudou-a-ciencia- londa-schienbinger/. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2021.

UNESCO. Decifrar o código: a educação de meninas e mulheres em ciências, tecnologia e matemática (STEM). Brasília: Unesco, 2018. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000264691. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2021.

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Barbalho, C. R. S., & Gomes, Y. M. (2023). Students in science: the scientific production of graduate women at UFAM. Informação & Informação, 27(3), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2022v27n3p158