The “subject” as element for records classification in the early XX century and its influences on contemporary approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p129Keywords:
Archival Science, Public Archives, Records Classification, Records Classification PlanAbstract
Introduction: Despite the specificities that records have, yet it is seen discussions and practices that agreed with subject-based classification. In this way is possible to reflect about this approach with a sampling that consists in two record classification plans from the early XX century, from public agencies from USA and Mexico and exposing the historical basis from part of the development of this approach in Brazil. Objectives: Firstly, it highlights the relevance of research about the history of Archival Science with an international and comparative approach. After that, it is exposed some discussions about records classification, its purposes and methods, in addition to the analysis the records classification plans and their elements, correlating them to some issues that urged from the contemporary debate of records classification. Methodology: To accomplish those objectives it was did a literature review and a systematization of Brazilian and international literature, adopting an historical gaze upon the time since 1912 until 2018. Results: The results suggests an historical perception about the need to methodological reformulation for develop records classification plans that could properly identify the context of production of records. Conclusion: It was possible to conclude that regardless that perception, the effective diffusion of proper records classification methodologies, including in Brazil, finds an obstacle as exists an historical process not only adherence, but also mainly an institutionalization of subject-based records classification.References
BARRITT, M. R. Coming to America: Dutch archivistiek and american archival practice. Archival Issues, v. 18, n. 1, p. 43-54, 1993. Disponível em: https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/45661. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
BRASIL. Resolução n. 4, de 28 de março de 1996, Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Arquivos, 29 de março de 1996.
BRASIL. Decreto nº 82.308, de 25 de setembro de 1978. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Arquivos – SINAR. Disponível em: http://conarq.arquivonacional.gov.br/o-sinar.html. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
BRASIL. Lei nº 6.546 de 4 de julho de 1978. Dispõe sobre a regulamentação das profissões de Arquivista e de Técnico de Arquivo, e dá outras providências. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/1970-1979/L6546.htm. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
BELLOTTO, H. L. Arquivo: estudos e reflexões. Belo Horizonte. Editora UFMG, 2017.
CAMPBELL, E. G. Functional classification of archival material. The Library Quarterly. v. 11, n. 4, p. 431-441, october, 1941. Disponível em: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/615060. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CARAVACA, M. M. Elements and Relationships within a records classification scheme. JLIS.it., v. 8, n. 2, p. 18-33, may, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.jlis.it/article/view/12374. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CARVALHO, E. M. de. Manual de classificação e archivamento de papéis e documentos commerciaes e civis. São Paulo: Editora ltda, 1931.
CASANOVA, E. Archivistica. 2 ed. Siena: Stab. Arti Grafiche Lazzeri, 1928. Disponível em: http://www.icar.beniculturali.it/biblio/pdf/EuCa/totalCasanova.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CASTRO, A. de M. e; CASTRO, A. de M. e; GASPARIAN, D. de M. e C.. Arquivística = técnica, Arquivologia = ciência. Brasília. ABDF, 1985.
CHATFIELD, H. L. The development of record systems. The American Archivist, v. 13, n. 3, p. 259-267, july, 1950. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.13.3.f31q7442x7162754. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CHATFIELD, H. L. The problem of records from the standpoint of management. The American Archivist, v. 3, n. 2, p. 93-101, april, 1940. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.3.2.d7683226j7167838. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
COOK, T. What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, v. 43, p. 17-63, spring, 1997. Disponível em: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12175/13184. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
COX, R. J. On the Value of Archival History in the United States. Libraries & Culture, v. 23, n. 2, p. 135-151, Spring, 1988. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25542039. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CRAIG, B. L. Outward visions, inward glance: archives history and professional identity. Archival Issues, v. 17, n. 2, p. 113-124, 1992. Disponível em: https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/45641. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CUVELIER, J. La Preparation des Archivistes. In: CUVELIER, J; STAINER, L. (Org.). Congrés de Bruxelles, 1910. Actes [...]. Bruxelles. Aux siége de la comission, 1912, p. 301-306. Disponível em: http://extranet.arch.be/congres1910/8B887_B_0301.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
DEUTRICH, M. Decimal filing: its general background and an account of its rise and fall in the U.S. War Department. The American Archivist, v. 28, n. 2, p. 199-218, april, 1965. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.28.2.r828586524467632. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Classification of correspondence, 1910. Washington. Government Printing Office, 1912. Disponível em: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044097047757&view=1up&seq=9. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
DEVRIESE, D. Pour une archivistique scientifique: relire Muller, Feith et Fruin. COMMA, Liverpool University Press, v. 2007, n. 1-2, p. 1-11, 2007. Disponível em: https://online.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/abs/10.3828/comma.2007.1-2.12?mobileUi=0&. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2019.
DÍAZ AROCHE, C. Bibliografia sobre Archivonomia. Bibliotecas y archivos – E.N.B.A., s.v., n. 3, p. 13-46, 1972. Disponível em: http://132.248.9.34/hevila/BibliotecasyarchivosMexicoDF/1981/no12/8.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
EVANS, F. B. Modern Methods of Arrangement of Archives in the United States. The American Archivist, v. 29, n. 2, p. 241-263, april 1966. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.29.2.7j27l2p346860442. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
FOSCARINI, F. Functional-based classification systems: an exploratory study of records management practices in central banks. 2009. 349 f. Phd Thesis (Doctor Of Philosophy) – Library, Archival and Information Studies Course, University Of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2009. Disponível em: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.3868&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
GROSSMAN, Jorge (Org.). Bibliography on Public Administration in Latin America. Washington D.C. Department of Cultural Affair – Pan American Union, 1958.
GUERCIO, M. La classificazione nell'organizzazione dei sistemi documentari digitali: criticità e nuove prospettive. JLIS. it, v. 8, n. 2, p. 4-17, may, 2017. Disponível em: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6085170. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
HENTTONEN, P.; KETTUNEN, K. Functional classification of records and organisational structure. Records Management Journal, v. 21, n. 2, p. 86-103, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09565691111152035/full/html. Acesso em 11 fev. 2019.
HEREDIA HERERA, A. La Archivística a debate. Boletín de la ANABAD, v. LXII, n. 1, p. 1-15, enero-marzo, 2012. Disponível em: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/12484/13052. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2019.
HICKERSON, T. Ten challenges for the archival profession. The American Archivist, v. 64, Spring/Summer, p. 6-16, 2001. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.64.1.0rg6525nu1437v31. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
KETELAAR, E. The difference best postponed? Cultures and comparative archival Science. Archivaria, Canadá, v. 44, p. 142-148, 1997. Disponível em: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12201. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
LATHAM, Earl. The Technique of Administrative Reporting. Public Administration Review, v.3, n.2, p.106-118, Spring, 1943.
LOPES, L. C. Vers une archivistique internationale à l’ère de l’information. Archives, v. 29, n. 2, p. 45-64, 1997-1998. Disponível em: http://www.archivistes.qc.ca/revuearchives/vol29_2/29-2-lopes.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MUJICA FARIAS, E. La Archivología Científica Moderna. Buenos Aires: Banco de la Nación Argentina, 1923.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. M. Classification: the understudied concept. International Journal of Information Management, v.35, n. 2, p. 176-182, 2015a. Disponível em: https://ukm.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/classification-the-understudiedconcept. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. The requirement for developing functional records classification. International Journal of Information Management, v. 35, n. 4, p. 403-407, 2015b. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276159231_The_requirement_for_developing_functional_records_classification. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. Records management practice: the issues and models for classification. International Journal of Information Management, v. 36, n. 6, p 1265–1273, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026840121630514X. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. M.; AHMAD, K.; JAMBARI, D. I. Development of function-based classification model for electronic records. International Journal of Information Management, v. 36, n. 8, p. 626-634, 2016. Disponível em: https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/1025490.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE. Records of the Department of State Relating to Internal Affairs of Brazil 1910-1929. Washington: NARS, 1972.
ORR, S. Functional-based classification of records: is it functional? 2005. 170 f. MA Thesis (Master of Science in Records Management Course), Northumbria Uni-versity, Newcastle, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228787956_Functionsbased_classification_of_records_is_it_functional. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
PAES, M. L. Arquivos correntes, o calcanhar de Aquiles da arquivologia. Rio de Janeiro, Acervo, v. 2, n. 1, p. 17-21, jan.-jun., 1987. Disponível em: http://www.arquivonacional.gov.br/media/v.2,n.1,jan-jun,1987.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
SANTOS, P. R. E. A institucionalização da arquivologia no Brasil e a reforma administrativa no primeiro governo Vargas (1935-1945). Revista Brasileira de História, v. 38, n. 78, p. 121-146, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-01882018000200121&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
SCHELLENBERG, T. R. Problemas arquivísticos do governo brasileiro. Acervo, v. 28, n. 2, jul.-dez., p. 287-300, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/v/107990. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
TORRES, M. V. Apontamentos de arquivística. Revista do Serviço Público, v. 84, n. 2, p. 138-144, agosto, 1959. Disponível em: https://revista.enap.gov.br/index.php/RSP/article/view/3741. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
VARGAS GUZMÁN, L. Manual de carteconomía. Cidade do México, Talleres Gráficos de la Nación, 1922.
BRASIL. Resolução n. 4, de 28 de março de 1996, Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Arquivos, 29 de março de 1996.
BRASIL. Decreto nº 82.308, de 25 de setembro de 1978. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Arquivos – SINAR. Disponível em: http://conarq.arquivonacional.gov.br/o-sinar.html. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
BRASIL. Lei nº 6.546 de 4 de julho de 1978. Dispõe sobre a regulamentação das profissões de Arquivista e de Técnico de Arquivo, e dá outras providências. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/1970-1979/L6546.htm. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
BELLOTTO, H. L. Arquivo: estudos e reflexões. Belo Horizonte. Editora UFMG, 2017.
CAMPBELL, E. G. Functional classification of archival material. The Library Quarterly. v. 11, n. 4, p. 431-441, october, 1941. Disponível em: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/615060. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CARAVACA, M. M. Elements and Relationships within a records classification scheme. JLIS.it., v. 8, n. 2, p. 18-33, may, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.jlis.it/article/view/12374. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CARVALHO, E. M. de. Manual de classificação e archivamento de papéis e documentos commerciaes e civis. São Paulo: Editora ltda, 1931.
CASANOVA, E. Archivistica. 2 ed. Siena: Stab. Arti Grafiche Lazzeri, 1928. Disponível em: http://www.icar.beniculturali.it/biblio/pdf/EuCa/totalCasanova.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CASTRO, A. de M. e; CASTRO, A. de M. e; GASPARIAN, D. de M. e C.. Arquivística = técnica, Arquivologia = ciência. Brasília. ABDF, 1985.
CHATFIELD, H. L. The development of record systems. The American Archivist, v. 13, n. 3, p. 259-267, july, 1950. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.13.3.f31q7442x7162754. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CHATFIELD, H. L. The problem of records from the standpoint of management. The American Archivist, v. 3, n. 2, p. 93-101, april, 1940. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.3.2.d7683226j7167838. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
COOK, T. What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, v. 43, p. 17-63, spring, 1997. Disponível em: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12175/13184. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
COX, R. J. On the Value of Archival History in the United States. Libraries & Culture, v. 23, n. 2, p. 135-151, Spring, 1988. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25542039. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CRAIG, B. L. Outward visions, inward glance: archives history and professional identity. Archival Issues, v. 17, n. 2, p. 113-124, 1992. Disponível em: https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/45641. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
CUVELIER, J. La Preparation des Archivistes. In: CUVELIER, J; STAINER, L. (Org.). Congrés de Bruxelles, 1910. Actes [...]. Bruxelles. Aux siége de la comission, 1912, p. 301-306. Disponível em: http://extranet.arch.be/congres1910/8B887_B_0301.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
DEUTRICH, M. Decimal filing: its general background and an account of its rise and fall in the U.S. War Department. The American Archivist, v. 28, n. 2, p. 199-218, april, 1965. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.28.2.r828586524467632. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Classification of correspondence, 1910. Washington. Government Printing Office, 1912. Disponível em: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044097047757&view=1up&seq=9. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
DEVRIESE, D. Pour une archivistique scientifique: relire Muller, Feith et Fruin. COMMA, Liverpool University Press, v. 2007, n. 1-2, p. 1-11, 2007. Disponível em: https://online.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/abs/10.3828/comma.2007.1-2.12?mobileUi=0&. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2019.
DÍAZ AROCHE, C. Bibliografia sobre Archivonomia. Bibliotecas y archivos – E.N.B.A., s.v., n. 3, p. 13-46, 1972. Disponível em: http://132.248.9.34/hevila/BibliotecasyarchivosMexicoDF/1981/no12/8.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
EVANS, F. B. Modern Methods of Arrangement of Archives in the United States. The American Archivist, v. 29, n. 2, p. 241-263, april 1966. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.29.2.7j27l2p346860442. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
FOSCARINI, F. Functional-based classification systems: an exploratory study of records management practices in central banks. 2009. 349 f. Phd Thesis (Doctor Of Philosophy) – Library, Archival and Information Studies Course, University Of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2009. Disponível em: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.3868&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
GROSSMAN, Jorge (Org.). Bibliography on Public Administration in Latin America. Washington D.C. Department of Cultural Affair – Pan American Union, 1958.
GUERCIO, M. La classificazione nell'organizzazione dei sistemi documentari digitali: criticità e nuove prospettive. JLIS. it, v. 8, n. 2, p. 4-17, may, 2017. Disponível em: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6085170. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
HENTTONEN, P.; KETTUNEN, K. Functional classification of records and organisational structure. Records Management Journal, v. 21, n. 2, p. 86-103, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09565691111152035/full/html. Acesso em 11 fev. 2019.
HEREDIA HERERA, A. La Archivística a debate. Boletín de la ANABAD, v. LXII, n. 1, p. 1-15, enero-marzo, 2012. Disponível em: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuario/article/view/12484/13052. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2019.
HICKERSON, T. Ten challenges for the archival profession. The American Archivist, v. 64, Spring/Summer, p. 6-16, 2001. Disponível em: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.64.1.0rg6525nu1437v31. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
KETELAAR, E. The difference best postponed? Cultures and comparative archival Science. Archivaria, Canadá, v. 44, p. 142-148, 1997. Disponível em: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12201. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
LATHAM, Earl. The Technique of Administrative Reporting. Public Administration Review, v.3, n.2, p.106-118, Spring, 1943.
LOPES, L. C. Vers une archivistique internationale à l’ère de l’information. Archives, v. 29, n. 2, p. 45-64, 1997-1998. Disponível em: http://www.archivistes.qc.ca/revuearchives/vol29_2/29-2-lopes.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MUJICA FARIAS, E. La Archivología Científica Moderna. Buenos Aires: Banco de la Nación Argentina, 1923.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. M. Classification: the understudied concept. International Journal of Information Management, v.35, n. 2, p. 176-182, 2015a. Disponível em: https://ukm.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/classification-the-understudiedconcept. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. The requirement for developing functional records classification. International Journal of Information Management, v. 35, n. 4, p. 403-407, 2015b. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276159231_The_requirement_for_developing_functional_records_classification. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. Records management practice: the issues and models for classification. International Journal of Information Management, v. 36, n. 6, p 1265–1273, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026840121630514X. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
MOKHTAR, U. A.; YUSOF, Z. M.; AHMAD, K.; JAMBARI, D. I. Development of function-based classification model for electronic records. International Journal of Information Management, v. 36, n. 8, p. 626-634, 2016. Disponível em: https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/1025490.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE. Records of the Department of State Relating to Internal Affairs of Brazil 1910-1929. Washington: NARS, 1972.
ORR, S. Functional-based classification of records: is it functional? 2005. 170 f. MA Thesis (Master of Science in Records Management Course), Northumbria Uni-versity, Newcastle, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228787956_Functionsbased_classification_of_records_is_it_functional. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
PAES, M. L. Arquivos correntes, o calcanhar de Aquiles da arquivologia. Rio de Janeiro, Acervo, v. 2, n. 1, p. 17-21, jan.-jun., 1987. Disponível em: http://www.arquivonacional.gov.br/media/v.2,n.1,jan-jun,1987.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
SANTOS, P. R. E. A institucionalização da arquivologia no Brasil e a reforma administrativa no primeiro governo Vargas (1935-1945). Revista Brasileira de História, v. 38, n. 78, p. 121-146, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-01882018000200121&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
SCHELLENBERG, T. R. Problemas arquivísticos do governo brasileiro. Acervo, v. 28, n. 2, jul.-dez., p. 287-300, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/v/107990. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
TORRES, M. V. Apontamentos de arquivística. Revista do Serviço Público, v. 84, n. 2, p. 138-144, agosto, 1959. Disponível em: https://revista.enap.gov.br/index.php/RSP/article/view/3741. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
VARGAS GUZMÁN, L. Manual de carteconomía. Cidade do México, Talleres Gráficos de la Nación, 1922.
Downloads
Published
2019-12-31
How to Cite
Alencar, P. J. V. de, & Schmidt, C. (2019). The “subject” as element for records classification in the early XX century and its influences on contemporary approaches. Informação & Informação, 24(3), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p129
Issue
Section
Dossiê Temático
License
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.
O conteúdo dos textos e a citação e uso de imagens submetidas são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores.
Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a Informação & Informação.
