Freud, the medical rationality and the constitution of the psychopathological object in psychoanalysis: an epistemological study

Authors

  • Kelly Moreira de Albuquerque Universidade de Fortaleza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-6407.2015v6n1p54

Keywords:

psychopathology, psychoanalysis, epistemology, clinic

Abstract

This work aims to investigate the scientific context of Freud's time, more specifically, rationality itself to medicine of his time, when his theoretical elaborations of the categories of normal and pathological. It is believed that the elucidation of the models of medical rationale contemporary to Freud allows an understanding of how it, Freud, subverted the models alluded, violating their fundamental theoretical and methodological canons, to finally have access to unprecedented of its object, the unconscious, radically changing the relationship between the normal and the pathological in the field of psychopathology. To do so, we will start in a Foucaultian perspective, the discussion of the discontinuity between the constituent rationalities of classic and modern medicine. Then characterize the predominant anatomical-clinical model in modern medicine, showing their effects in the theoretical constructs in psychopathology and, a subversive position, the Freudian refraction. Freud thought the disease as a totalizing phenomenon, a dynamic perspective. He was railed the ontologization the disease. In antiobjetivista position, he proposed a homogeneous conception of psychic disturbances, redefining them as forms of subjectivity.

Author Biography

Kelly Moreira de Albuquerque, Universidade de Fortaleza

PhD student in psychology at the Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR). Psychology Professor at Fanor-Devry Brasil

References

Assoun, P-L. (1983). Introdução à epistemologia freudiana. Rio de Janeiro: Imago.

Canguilhem, G.(2010). O normal e o patológico. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária. (Originalmente publicado em 1966).

Estellita-Lins, C. E. (2007). Saúde e doença na psicanálise: sobre Georges Canguilhem e Donald W. Winnicott In: B. Bezerra Jr., F. Ortega. Winnicott e seus interlocutores (pp. 340-360). Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.

Foucault, M. (2008). O nascimento da clínica. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária. (Originalmente publicado em 1964).

Freud, S. (2014). Conferências Introdutórias à Psicanálise. Obras Completas, volume 13. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. (Originalmente publicado em 1916-17).

Freud, S. (2011). Resumo da psicanálise. Obras Completas, volume 16. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. (Originalmente publicado em 1924).

PINHEIRO, C V de Q. (2006). Saberes e práticas médicas e a constituição da identidade pessoal. Physis, Rio de Janeiro, 16(1), 45-58. doi: 10.1590/S0103-73312006000100004

PRATA, M R. (1999). O normal e o patológico em Freud. Physis: Rio de Janeiro, 9(1), 37-81.

Simanke, R. T. (2002). Metapsicologia lacaniana: os anos de formação. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial; Curitiba: Editora UFPR.

Published

2015-06-19

How to Cite

Albuquerque, K. M. de. (2015). Freud, the medical rationality and the constitution of the psychopathological object in psychoanalysis: an epistemological study. Estudos Interdisciplinares Em Psicologia, 6(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-6407.2015v6n1p54

Issue

Section

Original Articles