Extraordinary appeal as a model for class action lawsuits

Authors

  • Fabrício Veiga Costa University of Itaúna
  • Alex Matoso Silva University of Itaúna
  • Rosemary Cipriano Da Silva University of Itaúna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2019v14n2p91

Keywords:

General Repercussion of Constitutional Problems, Procedural merit, Democratic Collective Process, Extraordinary Appeal, Admissibility requirement.

Abstract

The Brazilian Constitutional Amendment 45 established ‘general repercussion’ as a constitutional requirement for the admissibility of any extraordinary appeal. Additionally, appellants must demonstrate that their appeal transcends individual interests. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that the general repercussion of a constitutional problem is of fundamental importance to appeals. Moreover, the participatory or collective democratic model ensures that all stakeholders have the right to participate in the foundation of any requisite of admissibility. Nonetheless, analysis of general repercussion should occur in the context of the analysis of the merits of the appeal, legitimizing dialogical participation of all interested parties in the construction of provisions, so that the extraordinary appeal is seen as a preferred model for democratic participation. This paper utilized literature review, whilst presenting critical examinations on the research topic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fabrício Veiga Costa, University of Itaúna

Post-doctorate.

Alex Matoso Silva, University of Itaúna

Master’s candidate.

Rosemary Cipriano Da Silva, University of Itaúna

Master.

Published

2019-08-31

How to Cite

Costa, F. V., Silva, A. M., & Da Silva, R. C. (2019). Extraordinary appeal as a model for class action lawsuits. Revista Do Direito Público, 14(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2019v14n2p91

Issue

Section

Artigos