Accuracy evaluation of two veterinary glucometers for use in dogs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0367.2018v39n1p19Keywords:
Blood glucose, Monitoring, Clinical trial.Abstract
The glucometers (GT) are important strategy for measuring blood glucose. They must be within the specifications of ISO 15197: 2013 and evaluated by analysis of the error grid. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two veterinary glucometers (GT1 and GT2) by comparing the blood glucose values measured in capillary blood with those provided by reference laboratory method in plasma samples, transformed or not at equivalent plasma values. In the evaluation of GT1 in capillary blood samples and the hexokinase laboratory method, the mean differences were 25.90 mg / dL and 26% of the samples fell within the limits proposed by ISO 15197: 2013. The comparison of GT1 to the estimated plasma glucose values showed a mean difference of 10.89 mg / dL and 99% of the samples were in the desired limits. Comparisons of GT2 and laboratory glucose oxidase in capillary blood samples, mean differences were 10.58 mg / dL and 22% of the samples met the ranges proposed by ISO; 15197: 2013. When evaluated by the estimated plasma glucose, the mean differences were 9.7029 mg / dL and 99% of the samples met the limits. When evaluated by the error grid, 87% of the samples evaluated by GT1 fell on the zones of errors A and B and those evaluated by GT2 presented 86% of the samples on such zones. The glucometers evaluated did not present the accuracy to measure capillary glycaemia according to the standards set in ISO 15197: 2013.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Copyright of the published manuscripts belongs to the Journal. Since manuscripts are published in an open access Journal, they are freely availablefor private use or for use for educational and non-commercial purposes.
The Journal has the right to make, in the original document, changes regarding linguistic norms, orthography, and grammar, with the purpose of ensuring the standard norms of the language and the credibility of the Journal. It will, however, respect the writing style of the authors.
When necessary, conceptual changes, corrections, or suggestions will be forwarded to the authors. In such cases, the manuscript shall be subjected to a new evaluation after revision.
Responsibility for the opinions expressed in the manuscripts lies entirely with the authors.
This Journal is licensed with a license Creative Commons Assignment-NonCommercial 4.0 International.