Ultrasonography of the penile urethra of healthy Dorper × Santa Ines lambs between 2 and 5 months of age

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2026v47n1p23

Keywords:

Sheep, Ultrasound Examination, Urethral lumen width, Urinary tract.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to establish, by ultrasonography, values of the width of the penile urethral lumen of Dorper × Santa Ines lambs, verify the effects of age and Dorper cross degree, and compare two types of linear probes. Forty healthy, uncastrated lambs (18 ½ Dorper and 22 ¾ Dorper) kept confined for fattening were studied. Ultrasonographic examinations were performed at 60 (beginning of confinement period), 120, and 150 days of age (end of confinement period). The penile urethra was examined at four sites: the proximal urethra (perineal region), sigmoid flexure (caudal aspect of the base of the scrotum), distal to the sigmoid flexure (cranial aspect of the base of the scrotum), and distal urethra (half the distance between the glans and the base of the scrotum). Images were acquired in B-mode with transcutaneous cross sections using two types of linear probes: for external use (13 MHz) and for transrectal use in large animals (10 MHz). The urethral lumen width was measured at each anatomical site. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Genetic factors did not influence the results. The image definition was lower for the probe for rectal use. The urethra was identified as a circular or elliptical structure with an anechoic lumen and slightly hyperechoic wall. Urethral width increased with age in the proximal urethra (P = 0.038), distal to the sigmoid flexure (P = 0.013), and in the distal urethra (P < 0.001), but not in the sigmoid flexure (P = 0.056). The effect of the type of probe used was confirmed at the four anatomical sites examined (P < 0.001), with higher values measured using the probe for rectal use. With the probe for external use, the lumen width ranged 0.5‒2.0 mm in the proximal urethra, 0.6‒1.9 mm in the sigmoid flexure, 0.7‒2.0 mm distal to the sigmoid flexure, and 0.7‒2.1 mm in the distal urethra. With the probe for rectal use, the values were 0.6‒2.3, 0.8‒2.2, 0.7‒2.1, and 0.8‒2.5 mm, respectively. Ultrasound examination of the penile urethra of Dorper × Santa Ines lambs is feasible, and the values obtained for lumen width can be accepted as a parameter for comparison. This examination can be performed using a linear probe for rectal use in large animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marina Franco, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Doctoral student in the Postgraduate Program in Animal Health Science, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Lisandra de Camargo Campos, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Doctoral student in the Postgraduate Program in Animal Health Science, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Mayara Cardoso dos Anjos , Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Doctoral student in the Postgraduate Program in Animal Health Science, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Clara Saad Arruda, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Undergraduate student of Course of Veterinary Medicine, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Tuany de Souza Ferreira , Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Undergraduate student of Course of Veterinary Medicine, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Gustavo Rodrigues Queiroz , Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Prof. Dr., Department of Veterinary Clinics, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Priscilla Fajardo Valente Pereira, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Prof. Dr., Department of Veterinary Clinics, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

Julio Augusto Naylor Lisbôa, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Prof. Dr., Department of Veterinary Clinics, UEL, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

References

AlLugami, A., Pückler, K., Wehrend, A., & Sickinger, M. (2017). Sonography of the distal urethra in lambs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 59(16), 1-6. doi: 10.1186/s13028-017-0283-2

Antonelli, A. C., Barrêto, R. A., Jr., Mori, C. S., Sucupira, M. C. A., Marcello, A. C. S., & Ortolani, E. L. (2012). Efeito de diferentes fontes energéticas na predisposição para urolitíase em cabritos. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 13(4), 487-493. doi: 10.5216/cab.v13i4.15617

Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Ovinos (2025). Lacaune. A.R.C.O. http://www.arcoovinos.com.br/PadraoRacial/Details/10

Braun, U., Schefer, U., & Fohn, J. (1992). Urinary tract ultrasonography in normal rams and in rams with obstructive urolithiasis. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 33(10), 654-659. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1481405/

Cook, M. J. (2023). Urinary calculi of small ruminants. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 39(2), 355-370. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2023.02.006

Costa, D. D. S., Costa, M. D. D., Silva, F. V., Rocha, V. R., Jr., Carvalho, Z. G., Tolentino, D. C., & Leite, J. R. A. (2012). Desempenho ponderal de cordeiros Santa Inês e F1 Dorper x Santa Inês em pastagens naturais. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 13(1), 237-243. https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/rbspa/article/view/40735/22593

Farver, T. B. (2008). Concepts of normality in clinical biochemistry. In Kaneko, J. J., Harvey, J. W., & Bruss, M. L., Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals (pp. 1-25). London: Academic Press.

Ferreira, D. O. L., Santarosa, B. P., Amorim, R. M., Chiacchio, S. B., & Gonçalves, R. C. (2015). Urolitíase obstrutiva em ovinos. Veterinária e Zootecnia, 22(2), 183-197. https://rvz.emnuvens.com.br/rvz/article/view/918

Ferreira, D. O. L., Santarosa, B. P., Belotta, A. F., Mamprim, M. J., Silva, A. A., Dias, A., Chiacchio, S. B., & Gonçalves, R. C. (2014). Alterações ultrassonográficas renais e vesicais de ovinos confinados e suplementados com cloreto de amônio. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 34(Supl.1), 99-106. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2014001300018

Guimarães, J. A., Mendonça, C. L, Sousa Guaraná, E. L., Dantas, A. C., Azevêdo, C. N., Câmara, A. C. L., Farias, C. C., & Afonso, J. A. B. (2012). Estudo retrospectivo de 66 casos de urolitíase obstrutiva em ovinos. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 32(9), 824-830. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2012000900002

Morais, M. V., Silva, A. P., Fº., Alencar, S. P., Mendonça, C. L., Costa, N. A., & Afonso, J. A. B. (2016). Indicadores clínico-epidemiológicos da urolitíase em pequenos ruminantes atendidos na rotina hospitalar. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Veterinária, 23(1/2), 9-14. doi: 10.4322/rbcv.2016.021

Riet-Correa, F., Simões, S. V. D., & Vasconcelos, J. S. (2008). Urolitíase em caprinos e ovinos. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 28(6), 319-322. https://www.pvb.com.br/portal/download_artigo/NDIwfDIwMjUwMzA3MTAyMzA3

Scott, P. (2013). Transabdominal ultrasonographic examination of 26 sheep with suspected urinary tract disease (2010-2012). Journal of Veterinary Science & Medical Diagnosis, 2(1), 1-5. doi: 10.4172/2325-9590.1000107

Scott, P. (2016). Practical use of ultrasound scans in small ruminant medicine and surgery. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 32(1), 181-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.09.008

Scott, P. R. (2012). Clinical, ultrasonographic and pathological description of bladder distension with consequent hydroureters, severe hydronephrosis and perirenal fluid accumulation in two rams putatively ascribed to pelvic nerve dysfunction. Small Ruminant Research, 107(1), 45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.04.007

Stieger-Vanegas, S. M., & McKenzie, E. (2021). Imaging of the urinary and reproductive tract in small ruminants. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 37(1), 75-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.10.002

Videla, R., & van Amstel, S. (2016). Urolithiasis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 32(3), 687-700. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2016.05.010

Downloads

Published

2026-03-03

How to Cite

Franco, M., Campos, L. de C., Anjos , M. C. dos, Arruda, C. S., Ferreira , T. de S., Queiroz , G. R., … Lisbôa, J. A. N. (2026). Ultrasonography of the penile urethra of healthy Dorper × Santa Ines lambs between 2 and 5 months of age. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 47(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2026v47n1p23

Issue

Section

Articles