Analyzing the Think-aloud protocol method, its contexts and variations.

Authors

  • Luciana Keller Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-2207.2022v13n3p103

Keywords:

Think-aloud Protocol, Design research tools, Usability

Abstract

Currently, the application of Think-aloud Protocol ( or Protocol Analysis) focuses on usability tests and interface development. However, the method has its origin (under different names) in the studies of Neurolinguistics and Cognitive Psychology at the beginning of the last century, exploring the functioning of the human mind through speech. This article discusses this method, presenting its trajectory to Design, its potentialities and criticisms. We believe that the issues raised in this discussion are enriching for researchers who wish to reproduce or adapt the protocol analysis method. Among these issues, the following are highlighted: the differences between its original application and in Design; variations developed to bypass methodological limitations. Therefore, we seek to assist in the identification of relevant parameters for the inclusion of the user in the project, in addition to provide theoretical references for a better understanding of the development of usability tests in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luciana Keller, Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Doutora; Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

References

ALSHAMMARI, T.; ALHADRETI, O.; MAYHEW, P. When to ask participants to think aloud: a comparative study of concurrent and retrospective think-aloud methods. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, vol.6, n3, 48-64, 2015.

BERG, W; BYRD, Dana. The Tower of London Spatial Problem-Solving Task: Enhancing Clinical and Research Implementation. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. 24. 586-604. 10.1076/jcen.24.5.586.1006. (2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.5.586.1006

BOREN; RAMEY. Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practiceI. EEE transactions on professional communication, vol. 43, no. 3, september 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/47.867942

DRENNAN, J. An evaluation of the role of the clinical placement coordinator in student nurse support in the clinical area. Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol.40, 475-483, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02396.x

ERICSSON, K.A.; SIMON, H.A. Protocol Analysis: verbal reports as data. Revised ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001

ERICSSON, K.A.; SIMON, H.A. Verbal reports as data. In Psychological Review, Vol. 87, no. 3, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215

FONTEYN, Marsha; KUIPERS, Benjamin; GROBE, Susan. A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research - QUAL HEALTH RES. Vol3, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300403

HERTZUM, M.;HOLMEGAARD, K. D. Thinking aloud influences perceived time. Human Factors, Vol. 57, n 1, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814540208

LEWIS, C; RIEMAN, J. Task-centered user interface design: a practical introduction. Boulder: University of Colorado, 1993

RIIHIAHO, Sirpa. Experiences with usability testing: effects of thinking aloud and moderator presence. Tese de doutorado. Helsinki: Aalto University publication series, 2015.

VAN DEN HAAK, M.J.; DE JONG, M.D.T. Analyzing the interaction between facilitator and participants in two variants of the think-aloud method. In Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference, 2005.

Published

2022-12-23

How to Cite

Keller, L. (2022). Analyzing the Think-aloud protocol method, its contexts and variations. Projetica, 13(3), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-2207.2022v13n3p103

Issue

Section

Edição especial P&D 2022

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.