Payment for Environmental Services (PES) and Environmental Rationality: Approximations

Authors

  • Natália Jodas UFSC
  • Cristiane Derani UFSC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p9

Keywords:

Economic Instruments, Payment for Environmental Services, Enviromental Evaluation, Economic Incentive, Environmental Rationality

Abstract

This study aims to investigate if the Payment for Environmental Services (PES), in some formats and contexts of development, can help building environmental rationality (Leff). In this light, the initial of the essay are the economic instruments of environmental management aimed at correcting market failures. In sequence, the different patterns of PES programs in Brazil are analyzed. In this context, it is argued if PES is chained to a policy of environmental precification (in a monetary sense) or if PES is an economic incentive (positive sanction). Towards the end of the present article, it is argued about a possible approximation of PES and the concepts of ecological rationalization. The methodology used in this article is based in literature review and document analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natália Jodas, UFSC

Master's Graduate Program in Law, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) area of concentration Law, State and Society; line of research Law, Environment and Ecology Policy.

Cristiane Derani, UFSC

Doctor in Law at University São Paulo (USP). Estudos de doutorado (bolsa CNpq) na J.W.Goethe Universitaet, Frankfurt. Possui estágio pós-doutoral na Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris. Livre-docente pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Professora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina UFSC). Coordenadora do grupo de pesquisa Estudos Avançados em Meio Ambiente e Economia no direito Internacional. Pesquisadora CNPq.

Published

2015-04-24

How to Cite

Jodas, N., & Derani, C. (2015). Payment for Environmental Services (PES) and Environmental Rationality: Approximations. Scientia Iuris, 19(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p9

Issue

Section

Artigos