Aportes de la dimensión sociocultural de la Organización del Conocimiento a las listas de encabezamientos de materia y tesauros equitativos y socialmente justos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n2p298Palabras clave:
Sistemas de organización del conocimiento, Lista de encabezamientos de materia, Tesauro, Equidad, Justicia socialResumen
Objetivo: Este estudio explora las investigaciones centradas en la dimensión sociocultural de la Organización del Conocimiento, con el objetivo de identificar y detallar estudios que contribuyan a hacer los sistemas de organización del conocimiento más equitativos y socialmente justos, con un enfoque en listas de encabezamientos de materia y tesauro.
Metodología: La investigación, de carácter aplicado, adopta un enfoque cualitativo, haciendo uso de la revisión bibliográfica sistemática como procedimiento metodológico.
Resultados: Se señalan críticas con relación a la estructura y terminología de los sistemas tradicionales, que reflejan un privilegio histórico para una perspectiva masculina, euroamericana, heterosexual, blanca y cristiana. Las recomendaciones proponen la colaboración con las comunidades para promover una representación más justa y equitativa, así como la incorporación de términos utilizados por las personas para referirse a sí mismas, términos representativos de la cultura local y grupos sociales minoritarios, así como el uso de un lenguaje amable y democrático, sugiriendo la implementación de estos cambios a nivel local.
Conclusiones: Se apoya la incorporación de mecanismos institucionalizados para solicitar y monitorear la revisión de términos en listas de encabezamientos de materia y tesauros, visando la transparencia y rendición de cuentas de las instituciones en la promoción de la equidad y la justicia social en los sistemas de organización del conocimiento.
Descargas
Citas
ABBAS, J. Creating Metadata for Children’s Resources: Issues, Research, and Current Developments. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 54, n. 2, p. 303-317, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0012
ADLER, M. The Case for Taxonomic Reparations. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 43, n. 8, p. 630-640, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-630
ADLER, M. Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books. Journal of Web Librarianship, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 309-331, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19322900903341099
ADLER, M.; HARPER, L. M. Race and Ethnicity in Classification Systems: Teaching Knowledge Organization from a Social Justice Perspective. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 67, n. 1, p. 52-73, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0025
ADLER, M.; HUBER, J. T.; NIX, A. T. Stigmatizing Disability: Library Classifications and the Marking and Marginalization of Books about People with Disabilities. Library Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 87, n. 2, p. 117-135, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/690734
ADLER, M.; TENNIS, J. T. Toward a Taxonomy of Harm in Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 40, n. 4, p. 266-272, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-266
ARKSEY, H.; O'MALLEY, L. Scoping Studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 19-32, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
BAIR, S. Toward a Code of Ethics for Cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly, [New York], v. 23, n. 1, p. 13-26, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v23n01_02
BARITÉ, M.; COLOMBO, S.; DUARTE BLANCO, A.; SIMÓN, L.; CABRERA CASTROMÁN, G.; ODELLA, M. L.; VERGARA, M. Diccionario de organización del conocimiento: clasificación, indización, terminología. Montevideo: Ediciones Universitarias, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/jspui/handle/20.500.12008/9028. Acesso em: 24 set. 2022.
BARITÉ, M.; RAUCH, M. Cultural Warrant: old and new sights from Knowledge Organization. In: LYKKE, M.; SVARRE, T.; SKOV, M.; MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, D. (ed.). Knowledge Organization at the Interface: proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference. Baden-Baden: Ergon-Verlag, 2020. p. 32-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-31
BATES, J.; ROWLEY, J. Social reproduction and exclusion in subject indexingA comparison of public library OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 67, n. 3, p. 431-448, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111124532
BEGHTOL, C. Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, [New York], v. 56, n. 9, p. 903-912, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20184
BERMAN, S. Follies & Deficiencies: LC’s Cataloging of Children’s Materials. School Library Journal, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 8, p. 50, 1976.
BERMAN, S. Prejudices and antipathies: a tract on LC subject heads concerning people. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1993. 211 p.
BISCALCHIN, R.; MOREIRA, W. Construção de vocabulários multilíngues: perspectivas culturais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 25, n. 4, p. 47-67, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/3690
BISWAS, P. Rooted in the Past: Use of “East Indians” in Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 56, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1386253
BOCCATO, V. R. C.; BISCALCHIN, R. As dimensões culturais no contexto da construção de vocabulários controlados multilíngues. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia, [Medellín], v. 37, n. 3, p. 237-250, 2014.
BUENTE, W.; BAYBAYAN, C. K.; HAJIBAYOVA, L.; MCCORKHILL, M.; PANCHYSHYN, R. Exploring the renaissance of wayfinding and voyaging through the lens of knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 76, n. 6, p. 1279-1293, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2019-0212
CAMPBELL, G. Queer theory and the creation of contextual subject access tools for gay and lesbian communities. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 27, n. 3, p. 122-131, 2000.
CHRISTENSEN, B. Minoritization vs. Universalization: Lesbianism and Male Homosexuality in LCSH and LCC. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 35, n. 4, p. 229-238, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-4-229
CLACK, D. H. The adequacy of library of congress subject headings for black literature resources. Library Resources & Technical Services, [Chicago], v. 22, n. 2, p. 137-144, 1978.
CLACK, D. H.; HARRIS, J. L. M. Treatment of people and peoples in subject analysis. Library Resources & Technical Services, [Chicago], v. 23, n. 4, p. 374–390, 1979.
COLQUHOUN, H. L.; LEVAC, D.; O'BRIEN, K. K.; STRAUS, S.; TRICCO, A. C.; PERRIER, L.; KASTNER, M.; MOHER, D. Scoping Reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 67, n. 12, p. 1291-1294, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
CORRÊA, L. A. S.; TOGNOLI, N. B. A justiça social na organização do conhecimento. In: BARROS, T. H. B.; LAIPET, R. C. F. (org.). Organização e representação do conhecimento em múltiplas abordagens. São Paulo: Pimenta Cultural, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31560/pimentacultural/2022.95613.14
CUNHA, I. M. R. F. Documentação africanista: linguagem e ideologia. Ciência da Informação, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 37-40, jan./jun. 1987.
DESROCHERS, N. Bilingual Conundrums: A Study of the Use of Subject Headings Pertaining to Québec as a Distinct Society. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, [Ontario], v. 37, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0005
DIAO, J.; CAO, H. Chronology in Cataloging Chinese Archaeological Reports: An Investigation of Cultural Bias in the Library of Congress Classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 54, n. 4, p. 244-262, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1150931
DÍAZ-JATUF, J. Indizar la disidencia afectivo-sexual en bibliotecas. buenas prácticas en el tratamiento de la información para la comunidad GLTTIBQ (gay, lésbicas, transexual, travesti, intersexual, bisexual, queer). In: ENCUENTRO NACIONAL DE CATALOGADORES, 8., 2021, Buenos Aires. Anais [...]. Buenos Aires: 2021. Disponível em: https://www.bn.gov.ar/resources/conferences/encuentroVIII/1LUNES/9_JATUFTEXTO.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2022.
DICK, A. L.; BURGER, M. Transforming subject access: Some critical issues for South African information professionals. South African Journal of Library & Information Science, [S. l.], v. 63, n. 2, p. 65, 1995.
DRABINSKI, E. Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction. Library Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 83, n. 2, p. 94-111, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/669547
DUARTE, M. E.; BELARDE-LEWIS, M. Imagining: Creating Spaces for Indigenous Ontologies. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 53, n. 5/6, p. 677-702, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1018396
DUDLEY, M. Q. A library matter of genocide: the Library of Congress and the historiography of the Native American holocaust. International Indigenous Policy Journal, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.9
EDGE, S. J. A Subject “Queer”-y: A Literature Review on Subject Access to LGBTIQ Materials. Serials Librarian, [S. l.], v. 75, n. 1-4, p. 81-90, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1556190
EVANGELISTA, I. V.; BARROS, T. H. B.; MORAES, J. B. E. Uma análise do discurso da dimensão cultural da ISKO. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, João Pessoa, v. 28, n. 2, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2018v28n2.38123
FISCHER, K. S. Critical Views of LCSH, 1990-2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 41, n. 1, p. 63-109, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v41n01_05
FOX, M. J. “Priorities of Arrangement” or a “Hierarchy of Oppressions?”:
Perspectives on Intersectionality in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge
Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 43, n. 5, p. 373–383, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-373
FURNER, J. Truth, relevance, and justice: towards a veritistic turn for KO. In: RIBEIRO, F.; CERVEIRA, M. E. (ed.). Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 2018. p. 468-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956504211-468
GERHARD, K. H.; SU, M. C.; RUBENS, C. C. An empirical examination of subject headings for Women’s Studies core materials. College & Research Libraries, [Chicago], v. 59, n. 2, p. 129-137, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.59.2.129
GHADDAR, J.; CAIDI, N. Indigenous Knowledge in a post-apology era: steps toward healing and bridge building. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, [Leesburg], v. 40, n. 5, p. 41-45, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2014.1720400511
GITISETAN, D. Subjects of concern: selected examples illustrating problems affecting information retrieval on Iran and related subjects using LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 20, n. 3, p. 43-55, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v20n03_04
GOMES, P.; FROTA, M. G da C. Knowledge Organization from a Social Perspective: Thesauri and the Commitment to Cultural Diversity. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 46, n. 8, p. 639-646, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-8-639
GOSART, U. Indigenous librarianship: Theory, practices, and means of social action. IFLA Journal, [London], v. 47, n. 3, p. 293-304, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035221991861
HAJIBAYOVA, L.; BUENTE, W. Representation of indigenous cultures: considering the Hawaiian hula. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 73, n. 6, p. 1137-1148, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2017-0010
HANDIS, M. W. Greek Subject and Name Authorities, and the Library of Congress. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 58, n. 2, p. 107-126, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1708523
HANKINS, R. Uncovering Black Feminist Writers 1963-90. Reference & User
Services Quarterly, [Chicago], v. 48, n. 3, p. 270–286, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.48n3.270
HARDESTY, J. L.; NOLAN, A. Mitigating Bias in Metadata: A Use Case Using Homosaurus Linked Data. Information Technology & Libraries, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i3.13053
HJØRLAND, B. Knowledge Organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 43, n. 6, p. 475-484, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-6-475
HJØRLAND, B. What is Knowledge Organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 86-101, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-86
HODGE, G. Systems of Knowledge Organization for Digital Libraries: beyond traditional authority files. Washington: The Council on Library and Information Resources, 2000. Disponível em: https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub91.pdf. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2021.
HOLLOWAY, S. W. LCSH in the Southern Levant. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 56, n. 7, p. 571-591, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1508107
HOWARD, S. A.; KNOWLTON, S. A. Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 67, n. 1, p. 74-88, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0026
HUDON, M. Multilingual thesaurus construction: integrating the views of different cultures in one gateway to knowledge and concepts. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 24, n. 2, p. 84-91, 1997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-1997-172-305
JACOBS, C. Ethical places, ethical spaces: stopping to listen. Indexer, [London], v. 25, n. 3, p. 161-166, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.2007.3
JOHNSON, M. Transgender Subject Access: History and Current Practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 48, n. 8, p. 661-683, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903534398
KAM, D. V. Subject headings for aboriginals: the power of naming. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 18-22, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/adx.26.2.27949465
KHURSHID, Z. Arabic Script Materials: Cataloging Issues and Problems. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 34, n. 4, p. 67, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v34n04_07
KNOWLTON, S. A. Three Decades Since Prejudices and Antipathies: A Study of Changes in the Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 40, n. 2, p. 123-145, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v40n02_08
KOFORD, A. How Disability Studies Scholars Interact with Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 52, n. 4, p. 388-411, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.891288
KUMASI, K. D.; JIMES, C.; GODWIN, A. E.; PETRIDES, L. A.; KARAGLANI, A. A Preliminary Study Interrogating the Cataloging and Classification Schemes of a K-12 Book Discovery Platform through a Critical Race Theory Lens. Open Information Science, v. 4, n. 1, p. 106-121, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2020-0009
LACEY, E. Aliens in the Library: The Classification of Migration. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 45, n. 5, p. 358-379, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-358
LEE, D. Indigenous Knowledge Organization: a study of concepts, terminology, structure and (mostly) indigenous voices. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v6i1.1427
LEE, T.; DUPONT, S.; BULLARD, J. Comparing the Cataloguing of Indigenous scholarships: first steps and findings. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 48, n. 4, p. 298-306, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2021-4-298
LO, G. “Aliens” vs. Catalogers: bias in the Library of Congress Subject Heading. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, [Binghamton], v. 38, n. 4, p. 170-196, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2019.1696069
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J.; RAMÍREZ, I. D. T. Gender Terminology and Indexing Systems: The Case of Woman’s Body, Image and Visualization. Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services, [Berlin], v. 57, n. 1, p. 34-44, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2007.34
MARTIN, J. M. Records, Responsibility, and Power: an overview of cataloging ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 59, n. 2/3, p. 281-304, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458
MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, D.; BUDD, J. M. Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 73, n. 4, p. 700–715, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129
MAZZOCCHI, F. Knowledge Organization System (KOS): an introductory critical account. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 45, n. 1, p. 54-78, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-1-54
MCAULIFFE, B. Queer Identities, Queer Content and Library Classification: Is “Queering the Catalogue” the Answer? Journal of the Australian Library & Information Association, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 2, p. 213-219, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2021.1915618
MCCULLOCH, A. Recognising Critical Librarianship. inCite, [S. l.], v. 41, n. 1/2, p. 24, 2020.
MCDONALD, C. Call Us by Our Name (s): Shifting Representations of the Transgender Community in Classificatory Practice. In: Knowledge Organization at the Interface. Ergon-Verlag, 2020. p. 284-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-284
MCKENNON, E. Importing Hegemony: Library Information Systems and U.S. Hegemony in Canada and Latin America. Radical History Review, [Durham], n. 95, p. 45-69, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2006-95-45
MCTAVISH, J. R.; NEAL, D. R.; WATHEN, C. N. Is what you see what you get? Medical Subject Headings and their organizing work in the violence against women research literature. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 38, n. 5, p. 381-397, 2011.
MENESES TELLO, F. La carga ideológica en los instrumentos para la organización bibliográfica. Revista General de Información y Documentación, [Madrid], v. 23, n. 1, p. 97-131, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2013.v23.n1.41451
MOULAISON-SANDY, H.; BOSSALLER, J. Providing Cognitively Just Subject Access to Indigenous Knowledge through Knowledge Organization Systems. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 55, n. 3, p. 129-152, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1281858
MURPHY, D. Knowledge Organization Systems and Information Ethics for Visual Resources. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 2, p. 1-13, 2020.
MUSTAFA EL HADI, W. Cultural Frames of Ethics, a challenge for information and Knowledge Organization. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej, [Varsóvia], v. 114, n. 2, p. 23-39, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.452
NAUMIS, C. Subject Indexing Trends in Libraries of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 51, n. 5, p. 491-509, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.756094
NAUN, Chew Chiat. Objectivity and Subject Access in the Print Library. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 43, n. 2, p. 83-95, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n02_07
NYITRAY, K. J.; REIJERKERK, D. Searching for Paumanok: a study of Library of Congress Authorities and Classifications for Indigenous Long Island, New York. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 59, n. 5, p. 409-441, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1929627
OLSON, H. A. Difference, culture and change: the untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 29, n. 1/2, p. 53-71, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v29n01_04
OLSON, H. A. How We Construct Subjects: a feminist Analysis. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 56, n. 2, p. 509-541, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2008.0007
OLSON, H. A. Patriarchal Structures of Subject Access and Subversive Techniques for Change. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, [Ontario], v. 26, n. 2/3, p. 1-29, 2001.
OLSON, H. A.; SCHLEGL, R. Standardization, Objectivity, and User Focus: A Meta-Analysis of Subject Access Critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 32, n. 2, p. 61-80, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n02_06
OLSRUD, L.; TELLMAN, J. C. Difficulties of subject access for information about minority groups. Acquisitions Librarian, [S. l.], n. 9-10, p. 47-60, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J101v05n09_06
PARÉ, G.; TRUDEL, M. C.; JAANA, M.; KITSIOU, S. Synthesizing Information Systems Knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, [Amsterdã], v. 52, n. 2, p. 183-199, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
PHELPS, S. F. Assessing a Consortium for a Multidisciplinary Subject. Collection Management, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 1, p. 35-56, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522
PINHO, F. A.; GUIMARÃES, J. A. C. Male Homosexuality in Brazilian Indexing Languages: Some Ethical Questions. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 39, n. 5, p. 363-369, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2012-5-363
RAGALLER, I.; RAFFERTY, P. Biases in the classification of Welsh art materialDispersion, dilettantism and depreciation. Aslib Proceedings, [S. l.], v. 64, n. 3, p. 262-273, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244563
REPORT of the SAC Ad-Hoc Subcommittee on concepts denoted by the term "Primitive". Technical Services Quarterly, [New York], v. 2, n. 1-2, p .121-153, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v02n01_09
RUMRILL, P. D.; FITZGERALD, S. M.; MERCHANT, W. R. Using Scoping Literature Reviews as a Means of Understanding and Interpreting Existing Literature. Work, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 3, p. 399-404, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2010-0998
SAMUELSSON, J. Knowledge Organization for feminism and feminist research: a discourse oriented study of systematic outlines, logical structure, semantics and the process of indexing. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 37, n. 1, p. 3–28, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2010-1-3
SHUBERT, S. B. Critical views of LCSH--ten years later: a bibliographic essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 15, n. 2, p. 37-98, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v15n02_04
SMITH, C. A. Consumer language, patient language, and thesauri: a review of the literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 99, n. 2, p. 135-144, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.005
STROTTMAN, T. A. Some of Our Fifty are Missing: Library of Congress Subject Headings for Southwestern Cultures and History. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 45, n. 2, p. 41-64, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v45n02_04
TODARO, A. J.; MARTÍNEZ, A. M. La mujer en una lista de encabezamientos de materia en español. Investigación Bibliotecológica, [Ciudad de México], v. 20, n. 41, p. 195-206, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2006.41.4102
VITAL, L. P.; HERNANDEZ, B. F.; SANTOS, A. D. Análise de conteúdo da produção científica da organização do conhecimento em sua dimensão política e social no Brasil. Informação & Informação, Londrina, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1-27, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p1
WALSH, G. “Can We Get There from Here?” Negotiating the Washouts, Cave-Ins, Dead Ends, and Other Hazards on the Road to Research on Africa. Reference Librarian, [S. l.], v. 42, n. 87/88, p. 5-96, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v42n87_02
WATSON, B. M. “There was Sex but no Sexuality*:” Critical Cataloging and the Classification of Asexuality in LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 58, n. 6, p. 547-565, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1796876
WATSON, B. M. Advancing Equitable Cataloging. In: NORTH AMERICAN SYMPOSIUM ON KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 8., 2021. Proceedings [...]. Washington: University of Washington, 2021. Disponível em: https://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/nasko/article/view/15887. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2022.
ZENG, M.L. Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 160-182, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-160
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Fabiola Rubim Silva, Paula Regina Dal'Evedove
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.
O conteúdo dos textos e a citação e uso de imagens submetidas são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores.
Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a Informação & Informação.
