Objetos digitais FAIR: uma perspectiva ecológica de disseminação

Linair Maria Campos; Nilson Theobald  Barbosa; Nina Gomes Sobral Barcello d'Almeida

doi:10.5433/1981-8920.2024v29n4p171

Authors

Linair Maria Campos Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF
Nilson Theobald Barbosa Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF
Nina Gomes Sobral Barcello d'Almeida Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2024v29n4p171

Keywords:

Boundary objects, Symbolic interactionism, FAIR digital objects, Dissemination of digital objects

Abstract

Objective: To explore the theoretical contributions of Boundary Objects Theory and symbolic interactionism applicable to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) digital objects from an ecological perspective, which contemplates different points of view in the dissemination of these objects, so that they can be interpreted and used by different communities, with different epistemologies.
Methodology: Exploratory analysis with a qualitative approach, using bibliographic research. As an approach for bibliographic research, Bardin's content analysis was adopted.
Results: It proposes a set of recommendations for the dissemination of FAIR digital objects that contemplate multiple points of view, in line with the ecological perspective of the Theory of Boundary Objects and symbolic interactionism.
Conclusions: The need for a more conscious and inclusive dissemination of objects is emphasized, considering the diversity of interpretations and contexts of use of digital objects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Linair Maria Campos, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

PhD in Information Science through the partnership between the Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) and the Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência Tecnologia (IBICT). Professor at the Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brasil.

Nilson Theobald Barbosa, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

PhD in Information Science from the Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). Professor at the
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brasil.

Nina Gomes Sobral Barcello d'Almeida, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

Master in Information Science from the Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, Brasil,

References

BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. ed. rev. e ampl. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.

BLUMER, H. Simbolic interactionism. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

BOWKER, G. C. et al. Towards information infrastructure studies: ways of knowing in a networked environment. In: HUNSINGER, J.; ALLEN, M.; KLASRUP, L. (Ed.). International handbook of internet research. Heildelberg: Springer Netherlands, 2010.

BOWKER, G. C.; STAR, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press. 1999.

BOWKER, Geoffrey C.; TIMMERMANS, Stefan; CLARKE, Adele E.; BALKA, Ellen (Ed.). Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.

CAMPOS, Linair Maria. Classificação de Objetos de Fronteira na Organização do Conhecimento e o Papel das Ontologias. Liinc em Revista, v. 14, n. 2, 2018.

DE SMEDT, K.; KOUREAS, D.; WITTENBURG, P. FAIR Digital Objects for Science: From Data Pieces to Actionable Knowledge Units. Publications 2020, 8, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8020021.

EKBIA, Hamid R. Digital artifacts as quasi-objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 6, 2009.

GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.

HARVEY, Ross. Preserving Digital Materials. München, Germany: Saur Verlag, 2005.

KALLINIKOS, J.; LEONARDI, P. M; NARDI, B. A. The challenge of materiality: origins, scope and prospects. In: LEONARDI, P. M.; NARDI, B. A.;KALLINIKOS, J. (Ed.). Materiality and organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, p. 3-22, 2012.

KALLINIKOS, Jannis; AALTONEN, Aleksi; MARTON, Attila. A theory of digital objects. First Monday, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 6, 2010.

LATOUR, B. Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp, 1997.

MARQUES, Luana Faria Sales; SAYÃO, Luís Fernando. Conectando a eScience à Ciência da Informação: o big metadado científico e suas funcionalidades. Revista de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação (RDBCI), v. 21, 2023.

SAYÃO, Luís Fernando; SALES, Luana Faria. UM MODELO DE IMPLEMENTAÇÃO PARA A INTERNET DE DADOS E SERVIÇOS FAIR. In:

SALES, Luana Farias; VEIGA, Viviane Santos de Oliveira; HENNING, Patrícia; SAYÃO, Luís Fernando (Eds.). Princípios FAIR aplicados à gestão de dados de pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro: IBICT, 2021. p. 145-162.

SAYÃO, Luís Fernando; SALES, Luana Faria; CARVALHO SEGUNDO, Washington Luís R. Objeto Digital FAIR: ampliando as fronteiras da gestão de dados. Informação & Sociedade, v. 33, 2023.

SCHWARDMANN, U. 2020. Digital Objects - FAIR Digital Objects: Which Services Are Required? Data Science Journal, 19: 15, pp. 1-6.

SEOANE, Maximiliano Vila; HORNIDGE, Anna-Katharina. The Politics of Data Portals in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management - Jistem USP, v. 17, 2020.

STAR, S. L. ; GRIESEMER, J. R. Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, v.19, n.3, p.387-420, 1989.

STAR, S.L. This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept science. Technology & Human Values, v.35, p. 601-617, 2010.

THIBODEAU, K. Overview of Technological Approaches to Digital Preservation and Challenges in Coming Years - The State of Digital Preservation: An International Perspective. Anais...Washington: CLIR and Library of Congress, 2002.

TROMPETTE, P.; VINCK, D. Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances, v. 3, n. 1, p. 3-25, 2009.

UMEMOTO, K. Walking in Another's Shoes: Epistemological Challenges in Participatory Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, v. 21, n. 1, p. 17-31, 2001.

WEBER, Jutta; KRAMARAE, Cheris. Categorizing Life and Death: The Denial o f Civilians in U.S. Robot Wars. In: BOWKER, Geoffrey C.; TIMMERMANS, Stef an; CLARKE, Adele E.; BALKA, Ellen (Eds.). Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. p. 233-250.

WEINBERGER, David. Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder. New York: Times Books, 2007.

WILKINSON, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, v. 3, 2016.

WINDECK, D.; WEBER, J.; STRAUSS, E. Enrolling managers to accept the business partner: the role of boundary objects. Journal of Management and Governance, v. 19, n.3, p. 617-563, 2013.