Terminology of urgency and guarantees for the theme representación: elements for the analysis of Sudden Emergency Domains (DES)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2020v25n3p239Keywords:
Sudden emergency domains, Domain analysis, Warranties, COVID-19Abstract
Introduction: The emerging domains are those that are relatively recent, which are configured as a consequence of specialization, of the progressive intersection between pre-existing thematic or disciplinary fields to the emergence of reality situations that require innovative responses. The work studies the notion of domain in knowledge organization and proposes a particular type of emerging domain, which is called the sudden emergency domain (DES), understood as any new area of knowledge that is born from imperatives of reality, and unpredictably. Objective: To contribute to the theoretical basis and characterization of DES, taking for illustrative purposes, the referential of the domain generated around COVID-19. Methodology: A three-level analysis is proposed: its name, its alluvial terminology and its mapping. The analysis is carried out from the theoretical and methodological perspectives provided by the organization of knowledge. The approaches centered on domain analysis, guarantees and vocabulary control stand out. Results: The results, of primary nature, aim to propose specific solutions to thematically represent DES. Conclusions: Among the conclusions, it is highlighted that the knowledge organization has a sufficient maturity point to effectively face the terminological problems of systematization and organization of concepts presented by emerging domains and DES, in particularReferences
ADHANOM, T. WHO Director-General's remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-remarks-at-themedia-briefing-on-2019-ncov-on-11-february-2020
ALBRECHTSEN, H. This is not domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, v. 42, n. 8, p. 557-561. 2015.
ALBRECHTSEN, H. Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis. The Indexer, v. 18, n. 4, p. 221-224, 1993.
AL-THUBAITY, A.; KHURSHID, A. Tracking knowledge of emergent domains. In: Proceddings: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Information Visualisation. Guildford: University of Surrey London, 2002.
BARITÉ, M. Literary warrant. Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 6, p. 517-536, 2018.
BARITÉ, M. La definición en Terminología. In: Álvarez Catalá, Sara y Mario Barité. Teoría y praxis en Terminología. Montevideo: CSIC, 2017.
BARITÉ, M. Diccionario de Organización del Conocimiento: Clasificación, Indización, Terminología. 6 ed. Montevideo: CSIC, 2015.
BEGHTOL, C. Universal concepts, cultural warrant and cultural hospitality. Advances in Knowledge Organization, n.8, p: 45-49. 2002.
BEGHTOL, C. Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bilbliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services, v.30, n. 2, p. 109-123, 1986.
BEVILACQUA, C. Por que e para que a linguística de corpus na terminologia. In TAGNIN, S. C. B. Corpora na terminologia. São Paulo: Hub, 2013.
BLISS, H. E. The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences. New York: Holt, 1929.
BULLARD, J. Warrant as a Means to Study Classification System Design. Journal of Documentation, v. 73, p. 75-90, 2017.
CABRÉ, M. T. La terminología: teoría, metodología, aplicaciones. Barcelona: Antártida/Empúries. 1993.
GUTIÉRREZ RODILLA, B. M. La ciencia empieza en la palabra: Análisis e historia del lenguaje científico. Barcelona: Península. 1998.
GUIMARÃES, J. A. C.; TOGNOLI, N. B. Provenance as a domain analysis approach in archival knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, v. 42, n. 8, p. 562-569, 2015.
HOEL, T.; JAN M., Pawlowki. Managing standards development in emergent fields of technology innovation – a proposed model of key processes in ICT standardization. In: Enterprise Interoperability: Proceedings of the Workshops of the Sixth International Conference. I-ESA ‘12, ISTE Ltd, London, 2012.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization, v. 44, n. 6, p. 436-464, 2017.
HJØRLAND, B. Theories of knowledge organization-theories of knowledge. Knowledge Organization, v. 40, n. 3, p. 169-181, 2013.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation, n. 58, p. 422–462, 2002.
HJØRLAND, B.; ALBRECHTSEN, H. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995.
IYER, H. Classificatory structures: concepts, relations and representation. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2012.
JENKINS, J. English as a lingua franca: interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, v. 28, n.2, p. 200-207, 2009.
LANCASTER, F. W. Vocabulary control in information retrieval systems. Advances in Librarianship, n. 7, p. 1-40, 1977.
LEE, J. M. E. Wyndham Hulme: a reconsideration. In: Rayward, W.B. The Variety of Librarianship: Essays in Honour of John Wallace Metcalfe. Sydney: LAA, 1976.
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J. Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge Organization, v, 42, n. 8, p. 570-580, 2015.
ORGANIZACIÓN PANAMERICANA DE LA SALUD. COVID-19: glosario sobre brotes y epidemias: un recurso para periodistas y comunicadores, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/es/node/70518
SACHS, M.; SMIRAGLIA, R. P. From encyclopedism to domain based ontology of knowledge management: the evolution of the Sachs Classification. Advances in Knowledge Organization, v. 9, p. 167-172, 2004.
SCHMIDT, K.; INA, W. Ordering systems: coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work,v.13, p. 349-408, 2004.
SEIDLHOFER, B. Common ground and different realities: world Englishes and English as a lingua franca». World Englishes, v. 28, n. 2, p. 236-245, 2009.
SMIRAGLIA, R. P. Domain analysis for knowledge organization: tools for ontology extraction. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. 2015.
SMIRAGLIA, R. P. Knowledge organization: some trends in an emergent domain. El profesional de la información, v. 21, n. 3, p. 225-227, 2012.
SOERGEL, D. Knowledge organization systems: overview. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.dsoergel.com/SoergelKOSOverview.pdf.
SWALES, J. M. Reflections on the concept of discourse community. ASp, n.69, p.7-1, 2016.
SWALES, J. M. Approaching the concept of discourse community. In: 38th Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, 38., 1987, Atlanta. Anais […]. Atlanta: ERIC, 1987.
TYRRELL, D. A. J.; Bynoe, M. L. Cultivation of a novel type of common cold virus in organ culture. British Medical Journal, p.1467-1470, 1965.
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA. Coronavirus & COVID-19: Glossary of Terms. UVA Health. Charlottesville: UVA, 2020. Disponível em: https://uvahealth.com/services/covid19-glossary
VALÉRIO, M.; BAZZO, W. A. O papel da divulgação científica em nossa sociedade de risco: em prol de uma nova ordem de relações entre ciência, tecnologia e sociedade. In:Congresso Brasileiro de Ensino da Engenheria, 33., 2005, Campina Grande. Anais [...].Campina Grande: COBENGE, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.abenge.org.br/cobenge/arquivos/14/artigos/SC-10-29987920900-1117474585219.pdf
ZHOU, W. Manual de prevención del coronavirus: 92 consejos basados en la evidencia científica que pueden salvar tu vida. S.l.: Alienta, 2020.
ALBRECHTSEN, H. This is not domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, v. 42, n. 8, p. 557-561. 2015.
ALBRECHTSEN, H. Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis. The Indexer, v. 18, n. 4, p. 221-224, 1993.
AL-THUBAITY, A.; KHURSHID, A. Tracking knowledge of emergent domains. In: Proceddings: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Information Visualisation. Guildford: University of Surrey London, 2002.
BARITÉ, M. Literary warrant. Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 6, p. 517-536, 2018.
BARITÉ, M. La definición en Terminología. In: Álvarez Catalá, Sara y Mario Barité. Teoría y praxis en Terminología. Montevideo: CSIC, 2017.
BARITÉ, M. Diccionario de Organización del Conocimiento: Clasificación, Indización, Terminología. 6 ed. Montevideo: CSIC, 2015.
BEGHTOL, C. Universal concepts, cultural warrant and cultural hospitality. Advances in Knowledge Organization, n.8, p: 45-49. 2002.
BEGHTOL, C. Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bilbliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services, v.30, n. 2, p. 109-123, 1986.
BEVILACQUA, C. Por que e para que a linguística de corpus na terminologia. In TAGNIN, S. C. B. Corpora na terminologia. São Paulo: Hub, 2013.
BLISS, H. E. The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences. New York: Holt, 1929.
BULLARD, J. Warrant as a Means to Study Classification System Design. Journal of Documentation, v. 73, p. 75-90, 2017.
CABRÉ, M. T. La terminología: teoría, metodología, aplicaciones. Barcelona: Antártida/Empúries. 1993.
GUTIÉRREZ RODILLA, B. M. La ciencia empieza en la palabra: Análisis e historia del lenguaje científico. Barcelona: Península. 1998.
GUIMARÃES, J. A. C.; TOGNOLI, N. B. Provenance as a domain analysis approach in archival knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, v. 42, n. 8, p. 562-569, 2015.
HOEL, T.; JAN M., Pawlowki. Managing standards development in emergent fields of technology innovation – a proposed model of key processes in ICT standardization. In: Enterprise Interoperability: Proceedings of the Workshops of the Sixth International Conference. I-ESA ‘12, ISTE Ltd, London, 2012.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization, v. 44, n. 6, p. 436-464, 2017.
HJØRLAND, B. Theories of knowledge organization-theories of knowledge. Knowledge Organization, v. 40, n. 3, p. 169-181, 2013.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation, n. 58, p. 422–462, 2002.
HJØRLAND, B.; ALBRECHTSEN, H. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995.
IYER, H. Classificatory structures: concepts, relations and representation. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2012.
JENKINS, J. English as a lingua franca: interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, v. 28, n.2, p. 200-207, 2009.
LANCASTER, F. W. Vocabulary control in information retrieval systems. Advances in Librarianship, n. 7, p. 1-40, 1977.
LEE, J. M. E. Wyndham Hulme: a reconsideration. In: Rayward, W.B. The Variety of Librarianship: Essays in Honour of John Wallace Metcalfe. Sydney: LAA, 1976.
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J. Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge Organization, v, 42, n. 8, p. 570-580, 2015.
ORGANIZACIÓN PANAMERICANA DE LA SALUD. COVID-19: glosario sobre brotes y epidemias: un recurso para periodistas y comunicadores, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/es/node/70518
SACHS, M.; SMIRAGLIA, R. P. From encyclopedism to domain based ontology of knowledge management: the evolution of the Sachs Classification. Advances in Knowledge Organization, v. 9, p. 167-172, 2004.
SCHMIDT, K.; INA, W. Ordering systems: coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work,v.13, p. 349-408, 2004.
SEIDLHOFER, B. Common ground and different realities: world Englishes and English as a lingua franca». World Englishes, v. 28, n. 2, p. 236-245, 2009.
SMIRAGLIA, R. P. Domain analysis for knowledge organization: tools for ontology extraction. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. 2015.
SMIRAGLIA, R. P. Knowledge organization: some trends in an emergent domain. El profesional de la información, v. 21, n. 3, p. 225-227, 2012.
SOERGEL, D. Knowledge organization systems: overview. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.dsoergel.com/SoergelKOSOverview.pdf.
SWALES, J. M. Reflections on the concept of discourse community. ASp, n.69, p.7-1, 2016.
SWALES, J. M. Approaching the concept of discourse community. In: 38th Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, 38., 1987, Atlanta. Anais […]. Atlanta: ERIC, 1987.
TYRRELL, D. A. J.; Bynoe, M. L. Cultivation of a novel type of common cold virus in organ culture. British Medical Journal, p.1467-1470, 1965.
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA. Coronavirus & COVID-19: Glossary of Terms. UVA Health. Charlottesville: UVA, 2020. Disponível em: https://uvahealth.com/services/covid19-glossary
VALÉRIO, M.; BAZZO, W. A. O papel da divulgação científica em nossa sociedade de risco: em prol de uma nova ordem de relações entre ciência, tecnologia e sociedade. In:Congresso Brasileiro de Ensino da Engenheria, 33., 2005, Campina Grande. Anais [...].Campina Grande: COBENGE, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.abenge.org.br/cobenge/arquivos/14/artigos/SC-10-29987920900-1117474585219.pdf
ZHOU, W. Manual de prevención del coronavirus: 92 consejos basados en la evidencia científica que pueden salvar tu vida. S.l.: Alienta, 2020.
Downloads
Published
2020-10-31
How to Cite
Barité, M. (2020). Terminology of urgency and guarantees for the theme representación: elements for the analysis of Sudden Emergency Domains (DES). Informação & Informação, 25(3), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2020v25n3p239
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.
O conteúdo dos textos e a citação e uso de imagens submetidas são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores.
Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a Informação & Informação.
