Ciência aberta: dimensões para um novo fazer científico

Adriana Carla Silva de Oliveira; Edilene Maria da Silva

doi:10.5433/1981-8920.2016v21n2p5

Authors

Adriana Carla Silva de Oliveira Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte - TJRN https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-0022
Edilene Maria da Silva Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-3198

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2016v21n2p5

Keywords:

Open Science, e-Science, Information Policies, Collaboration, Dimensions.

Abstract

Introduction:The practices of e-science and the use and reuse of scientific data have constituted a new scientific work that leads to the reflection on new regulatory, legal, institutional and technological frameworks for open science.
Objective: This study shows the following research question: which dimensions provide sustainability for the formulation of a policy geared to open science and its practices in the Brazilian context? The aim of this study is to discuss the dimensions that support transversely the formulation of a policy for open science and its scientific practices.
Methodology: Theoretically, the study is guided by the fourth scientific paradigm grounded in the e-Science. The methodology is supported by Bufrem’s studies (2013), which propose an alternative and multidimensional model for analysis and discussion of scientific research. Technically, the literature review and documentary survey were the methods used on the Data Lifecycle scientific model, laws and international agreements. For this study purpose, five dimensions were proposed, namely: epistemological, political, ethical-legal-cultural, morphological, and technological.
Results: This studyunderstands that these dimensions substantiate an information policy or the development of minimum guidelines for the open science agenda in Brazil.
Conclusions: The dimensions put away the reductionist perspective on survey data and they conducted the study for the multi-dimensional and multi-relational vision of open science.

Author Biographies

Adriana Carla Silva de Oliveira, Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte - TJRN

Doctorate in Information Science from the Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Judicial Analyst at the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte.

Edilene Maria da Silva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE

Doctorate in Information Science from the Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Professor at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

References

ALBAGLI, Sarita. Ciência aberta em questão. In: ALBAGLI, Sarita; MACIEL, Maria Lúcia; ABDO, Alexandre Hannud (ed.). Ciência aberta, questões abertas. Brasília: IBICT; Rio de Janeiro: UNIRIO, 2015. p. 9-26.

AULETE, Francisco Julio de Caldas; VALENTE, Antônio L. S. Dicionário Aulete. Rio de Janeiro: Lexicon, [2012].

BORGMAN, Christine L. Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.

BORGMAN, Christine L. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1059-1078, 2012. Disponível em: http://ez45.periodicos.capes.gov.br/doi/10.1002/asi.22634/pdf%3E. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2014.

BRAMAN, Sandra. Change of state: information, policy, and power. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009.

BRUYNE, Paul de; HERMAN, Jacques; SCHOUTHEETE, Marc de. Dinâmica da pesquisa em ciências sociais: os pólos da prática metodológica. Tradução de Ruth Joffily. Rio de Janeiro: F. Alves, 1977.

BUFREM, Leilah. Configurações da pesquisa em ciência da informação. Datagrama Zero, Rio de Janeiro, v. 14, n. 6, 2013. Disponível em: http://basessibi.c3sl.ufpr.br/brapci/v/a/14107. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2014.

CARVALKO, Joseph R.; MORRIS, Cara. The science and technology: guidebook for Lawyers. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2014.

DATA ONE. Data Observation Network for Earth. [S. l.: s. n.], 2005. Disponível em: https://www.dataone.org/. Acesso em: 16 fev. 2015.

DATA ONE. Tutorials on Data Management. [S. l.: s. n.], 2012. Disponível em: http://www.dataone.org/sites/all/documents/L01_DataManagement.pptx. Acesso em: 16 fev. 2015.

DATA. In: Lexico.com. Oxford: Oxford University Press, c2022. Disponível em: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/data?q=data. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2022.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. H2020 programme: guidelines on open access to scientific publications and research data in horizon 2020. [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. Disponível em: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf. Acesso em: 2 abr. 2016.

FROSIO, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 2014.

GONZÁLEZ DE GÓMEZ, Maria Nélida. Da política de informação ao papel da informação na política contemporânea. Revista Internacional de Estudos Políticos: RIEP, Rio de Janeiro, v. 1, n. 1, p. 63-97, 1999.

HEY, Tony. The big idea: the next scientific revolution. Harvard Business Review, Brighton, 2010. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2010/11/the-bigidea-the-next-scientific-revolution. Acesso em: 2 abr. 2016.

HEY, Tony; TANSLEY, Stewart; TOLLE, Kristin (ed.). Jim Gray on eScience: a transformed scientific method. In: HEY, Tony; TANSLEY, Stewart; TOLLE, Kristin; Jim GRAY (ed.). The fourth paradigm: dataintensive scientific discovery. Redmond: Microsoft Research, 2009. p. xvii-xxxi. Disponível em: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc31516/. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2016.

HOUAISS, Antônio. Dicionário Houaiss da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2001.

ICPSR - INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. Guide to Social Science Data Praparation and Archives. 5th. [S. l.]: ICPSR, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/ICPSR/access/dataprep.pdf. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2015.

JARDIM, José Maria. Memória e políticas públicas de informação. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Casa de Rui Barbosa, 2004.

KROKOSCZ, Marcelo. Outras palavras sobre autoria e plágio. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.

KUHN, Thomas S. The structure of scientific revolutions. In: INTERNATIONAL Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1962. p. 1-210. v. 2. Disponível em: http://projektintegracija.pravo.hr/_download/repository/Kuhn_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions.pdf. Acesso em: 14 set. 2015.

KUHN, Thomas. Life and Career. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [S. l.: s. n.], 2013. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/. Acesso em: 11 set. 2015.

LAFUENTE, Antonio; ESTALELLA, Adolfo. Modos de ciência: pública, abierta y común. In: ALBAGLI, Sarita; MACIEL, Maria Lucia; ABDO, Alexandre Hannud (org.). Ciência aberta, questões abertas. Brasília: IBICT; Rio de Janeiro: UNIRIO, 2015.

NOW - NETHERLANDS ORGANISATION FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. Open science. Amsterdan: [s. n.], 2016. Disponível em: http://www.nwo.nl/en/policies/open+science. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2016.

NSF - NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. Long-lived digital data collections: enabling research and education in the 21st century. Arlington: National Science Board, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/nsb0540.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2015.

OECD - ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Paris, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org/sti/scitech/38500813.pdf. Acesso em: 20 set. 2013.

OLIVEIRA, Adriana Carla Silva; DIAS, G. A.; CORRÊA, P. L. P.; ANJOS, R. L.; SOUZA, V. M. Quarto paradigma científico: adoção do data life cycle model para o gerenciamento de dados científicos abertos do experimento e-quilt prototype. In: CONFERÊNCIA LUSO-RASILEIRACONFOA, 6., Salvador, 2015. Anais [...]. Salvador: UFB, 2015. Disponível em: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B2CiJWPT1NhwcmNiZ1BwZWY5TVU&usp=sharing. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2016.

OSTROM, Elinor Claire Lin. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

SAYÃO, Luís Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. Dados de pesquisa: contribuição para o estabelecimento de um modelo de curadoria digital para o país. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, n. 1, 2013. Disponível em: http://inseer.ibict.br/ancib/index.php/tpbci/article/viewArticle/102. Acesso em: 21set. 2015.

SERINGHAUS, Michael R.; GERSTEIN, Mark. B. Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow's information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics, London, v. 8, n. 17, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/17. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2016.

SILVA, Edilene Maria; GARCIA, Joana Coeli Ribeiro. Política de informação científica e tecnológica no Brasil. Datagrama Zero, Rio de Janeiro, v. 15, n. 4, 2014.

TENOPIR, Carol; ALLARD, Suzie; DOUGLASS, Kimberly; AYDINOGLU, Arsev Umur; WU, Lei; READ, Eleanor; MANOFF, Maribeth; FRAME, Mike. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoSONE, San Francisco, v. 6, n. 6, jun. 2011. Disponível em: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2015.