Contribuições da dimensão sociocultural da Organização do Conhecimento para cabeçalhos de assunto e tesauros equitativos e socialmente justos

Fabiola Rubim Silva; Paula Regina Dal'Evedove

doi:10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n2p298

Autores

Fabiola Rubim Silva Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8786-7819
Paula Regina Dal'Evedove Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1521-2201

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n2p298

Palavras-chave:

Sistemas de organização do conhecimento, Listas de cabeçalhos de assunto, Tesauros, Equidade, Justiça social

Resumo

Objetivo: Este estudo explora as pesquisas focadas na dimensão sociocultural da Organização do Conhecimento, visando identificar e detalhar estudos que contribuam para tornar os sistemas de organização do conhecimento mais equitativos e socialmente justos, com ênfase em listas de cabeçalhos de assunto e tesauro.
Metodologia: A pesquisa, de natureza aplicada, adota abordagem qualitativa, fazendo uso do mapeamento sistemático de literatura como procedimento metodológico.
Resultados: São apontadas críticas em relação à estrutura e terminologia dos sistemas tradicionais, que refletem um privilégio histórico para uma perspectiva masculina, euro-americana, heterossexual, branca e cristã. As recomendações propõem a colaboração com as comunidades para promover uma representação mais justa e equitativa, bem como a incorporação de termos usados pelas pessoas para se referirem a si mesmas, termos representativos da cultura local e grupos sociais minoritários, além do uso de uma linguagem amigável e democrática, sugerindo a implementação dessas mudanças localmente.
Conclusões: Defende a incorporação de mecanismos institucionalizados para solicitação e acompanhamento da revisão dos termos em listas de cabeçalhos de assunto e tesauros, visando a transparência e a responsabilização das instituições na promoção da equidade e justiça social nos sistemas de organização do conhecimento.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Fabiola Rubim Silva, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF

Mestra em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar). Bibliotecária-documentalista da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Brasil.

Paula Regina Dal'Evedove, Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar

Doutora em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP). Doutora em Gestión de Información pela Universidad de Murcia (UMU), Espanha. Docente do Departamento de Ciência da Informação da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brasil.

Referências

ABBAS, J. Creating Metadata for Children’s Resources: Issues, Research, and Current Developments. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 54, n. 2, p. 303-317, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0012

ADLER, M. The Case for Taxonomic Reparations. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 43, n. 8, p. 630-640, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-630

ADLER, M. Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books. Journal of Web Librarianship, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 309-331, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19322900903341099

ADLER, M.; HARPER, L. M. Race and Ethnicity in Classification Systems: Teaching Knowledge Organization from a Social Justice Perspective. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 67, n. 1, p. 52-73, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0025

ADLER, M.; HUBER, J. T.; NIX, A. T. Stigmatizing Disability: Library Classifications and the Marking and Marginalization of Books about People with Disabilities. Library Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 87, n. 2, p. 117-135, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/690734

ADLER, M.; TENNIS, J. T. Toward a Taxonomy of Harm in Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 40, n. 4, p. 266-272, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-266

ARKSEY, H.; O'MALLEY, L. Scoping Studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 19-32, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

BAIR, S. Toward a Code of Ethics for Cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly, [New York], v. 23, n. 1, p. 13-26, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v23n01_02

BARITÉ, M.; COLOMBO, S.; DUARTE BLANCO, A.; SIMÓN, L.; CABRERA CASTROMÁN, G.; ODELLA, M. L.; VERGARA, M. Diccionario de organización del conocimiento: clasificación, indización, terminología. Montevideo: Ediciones Universitarias, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/jspui/handle/20.500.12008/9028. Acesso em: 24 set. 2022.

BARITÉ, M.; RAUCH, M. Cultural Warrant: old and new sights from Knowledge Organization. In: LYKKE, M.; SVARRE, T.; SKOV, M.; MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, D. (ed.). Knowledge Organization at the Interface: proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference. Baden-Baden: Ergon-Verlag, 2020. p. 32-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-31

BATES, J.; ROWLEY, J. Social reproduction and exclusion in subject indexingA comparison of public library OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 67, n. 3, p. 431-448, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111124532

BEGHTOL, C. Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, [New York], v. 56, n. 9, p. 903-912, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20184

BERMAN, S. Follies & Deficiencies: LC’s Cataloging of Children’s Materials. School Library Journal, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 8, p. 50, 1976.

BERMAN, S. Prejudices and antipathies: a tract on LC subject heads concerning people. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1993. 211 p.

BISCALCHIN, R.; MOREIRA, W. Construção de vocabulários multilíngues: perspectivas culturais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 25, n. 4, p. 47-67, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/3690

BISWAS, P. Rooted in the Past: Use of “East Indians” in Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 56, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1386253

BOCCATO, V. R. C.; BISCALCHIN, R. As dimensões culturais no contexto da construção de vocabulários controlados multilíngues. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia, [Medellín], v. 37, n. 3, p. 237-250, 2014.

BUENTE, W.; BAYBAYAN, C. K.; HAJIBAYOVA, L.; MCCORKHILL, M.; PANCHYSHYN, R. Exploring the renaissance of wayfinding and voyaging through the lens of knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 76, n. 6, p. 1279-1293, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2019-0212

CAMPBELL, G. Queer theory and the creation of contextual subject access tools for gay and lesbian communities. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 27, n. 3, p. 122-131, 2000.

CHRISTENSEN, B. Minoritization vs. Universalization: Lesbianism and Male Homosexuality in LCSH and LCC. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 35, n. 4, p. 229-238, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-4-229

CLACK, D. H. The adequacy of library of congress subject headings for black literature resources. Library Resources & Technical Services, [Chicago], v. 22, n. 2, p. 137-144, 1978.

CLACK, D. H.; HARRIS, J. L. M. Treatment of people and peoples in subject analysis. Library Resources & Technical Services, [Chicago], v. 23, n. 4, p. 374–390, 1979.

COLQUHOUN, H. L.; LEVAC, D.; O'BRIEN, K. K.; STRAUS, S.; TRICCO, A. C.; PERRIER, L.; KASTNER, M.; MOHER, D. Scoping Reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 67, n. 12, p. 1291-1294, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013

CORRÊA, L. A. S.; TOGNOLI, N. B. A justiça social na organização do conhecimento. In: BARROS, T. H. B.; LAIPET, R. C. F. (org.). Organização e representação do conhecimento em múltiplas abordagens. São Paulo: Pimenta Cultural, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31560/pimentacultural/2022.95613.14

CUNHA, I. M. R. F. Documentação africanista: linguagem e ideologia. Ciência da Informação, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 37-40, jan./jun. 1987.

DESROCHERS, N. Bilingual Conundrums: A Study of the Use of Subject Headings Pertaining to Québec as a Distinct Society. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, [Ontario], v. 37, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0005

DIAO, J.; CAO, H. Chronology in Cataloging Chinese Archaeological Reports: An Investigation of Cultural Bias in the Library of Congress Classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 54, n. 4, p. 244-262, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1150931

DÍAZ-JATUF, J. Indizar la disidencia afectivo-sexual en bibliotecas. buenas prácticas en el tratamiento de la información para la comunidad GLTTIBQ (gay, lésbicas, transexual, travesti, intersexual, bisexual, queer). In: ENCUENTRO NACIONAL DE CATALOGADORES, 8., 2021, Buenos Aires. Anais [...]. Buenos Aires: 2021. Disponível em: https://www.bn.gov.ar/resources/conferences/encuentroVIII/1LUNES/9_JATUFTEXTO.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2022.

DICK, A. L.; BURGER, M. Transforming subject access: Some critical issues for South African information professionals. South African Journal of Library & Information Science, [S. l.], v. 63, n. 2, p. 65, 1995.

DRABINSKI, E. Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction. Library Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 83, n. 2, p. 94-111, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/669547

DUARTE, M. E.; BELARDE-LEWIS, M. Imagining: Creating Spaces for Indigenous Ontologies. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 53, n. 5/6, p. 677-702, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1018396

DUDLEY, M. Q. A library matter of genocide: the Library of Congress and the historiography of the Native American holocaust. International Indigenous Policy Journal, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.9

EDGE, S. J. A Subject “Queer”-y: A Literature Review on Subject Access to LGBTIQ Materials. Serials Librarian, [S. l.], v. 75, n. 1-4, p. 81-90, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1556190

EVANGELISTA, I. V.; BARROS, T. H. B.; MORAES, J. B. E. Uma análise do discurso da dimensão cultural da ISKO. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, João Pessoa, v. 28, n. 2, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2018v28n2.38123

FISCHER, K. S. Critical Views of LCSH, 1990-2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 41, n. 1, p. 63-109, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v41n01_05

FOX, M. J. “Priorities of Arrangement” or a “Hierarchy of Oppressions?”:

Perspectives on Intersectionality in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge

Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 43, n. 5, p. 373–383, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-373

FURNER, J. Truth, relevance, and justice: towards a veritistic turn for KO. In: RIBEIRO, F.; CERVEIRA, M. E. (ed.). Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 2018. p. 468-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956504211-468

GERHARD, K. H.; SU, M. C.; RUBENS, C. C. An empirical examination of subject headings for Women’s Studies core materials. College & Research Libraries, [Chicago], v. 59, n. 2, p. 129-137, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.59.2.129

GHADDAR, J.; CAIDI, N. Indigenous Knowledge in a post-apology era: steps toward healing and bridge building. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, [Leesburg], v. 40, n. 5, p. 41-45, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2014.1720400511

GITISETAN, D. Subjects of concern: selected examples illustrating problems affecting information retrieval on Iran and related subjects using LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 20, n. 3, p. 43-55, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v20n03_04

GOMES, P.; FROTA, M. G da C. Knowledge Organization from a Social Perspective: Thesauri and the Commitment to Cultural Diversity. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 46, n. 8, p. 639-646, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-8-639

GOSART, U. Indigenous librarianship: Theory, practices, and means of social action. IFLA Journal, [London], v. 47, n. 3, p. 293-304, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035221991861

HAJIBAYOVA, L.; BUENTE, W. Representation of indigenous cultures: considering the Hawaiian hula. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 73, n. 6, p. 1137-1148, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2017-0010

HANDIS, M. W. Greek Subject and Name Authorities, and the Library of Congress. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 58, n. 2, p. 107-126, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1708523

HANKINS, R. Uncovering Black Feminist Writers 1963-90. Reference & User

Services Quarterly, [Chicago], v. 48, n. 3, p. 270–286, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.48n3.270

HARDESTY, J. L.; NOLAN, A. Mitigating Bias in Metadata: A Use Case Using Homosaurus Linked Data. Information Technology & Libraries, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i3.13053

HJØRLAND, B. Knowledge Organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 43, n. 6, p. 475-484, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-6-475

HJØRLAND, B. What is Knowledge Organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 86-101, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-86

HODGE, G. Systems of Knowledge Organization for Digital Libraries: beyond traditional authority files. Washington: The Council on Library and Information Resources, 2000. Disponível em: https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub91.pdf. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2021.

HOLLOWAY, S. W. LCSH in the Southern Levant. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 56, n. 7, p. 571-591, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1508107

HOWARD, S. A.; KNOWLTON, S. A. Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 67, n. 1, p. 74-88, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0026

HUDON, M. Multilingual thesaurus construction: integrating the views of different cultures in one gateway to knowledge and concepts. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 24, n. 2, p. 84-91, 1997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-1997-172-305

JACOBS, C. Ethical places, ethical spaces: stopping to listen. Indexer, [London], v. 25, n. 3, p. 161-166, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.2007.3

JOHNSON, M. Transgender Subject Access: History and Current Practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 48, n. 8, p. 661-683, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903534398

KAM, D. V. Subject headings for aboriginals: the power of naming. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 18-22, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/adx.26.2.27949465

KHURSHID, Z. Arabic Script Materials: Cataloging Issues and Problems. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 34, n. 4, p. 67, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v34n04_07

KNOWLTON, S. A. Three Decades Since Prejudices and Antipathies: A Study of Changes in the Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 40, n. 2, p. 123-145, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v40n02_08

KOFORD, A. How Disability Studies Scholars Interact with Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 52, n. 4, p. 388-411, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.891288

KUMASI, K. D.; JIMES, C.; GODWIN, A. E.; PETRIDES, L. A.; KARAGLANI, A. A Preliminary Study Interrogating the Cataloging and Classification Schemes of a K-12 Book Discovery Platform through a Critical Race Theory Lens. Open Information Science, v. 4, n. 1, p. 106-121, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2020-0009

LACEY, E. Aliens in the Library: The Classification of Migration. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 45, n. 5, p. 358-379, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-358

LEE, D. Indigenous Knowledge Organization: a study of concepts, terminology, structure and (mostly) indigenous voices. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v6i1.1427

LEE, T.; DUPONT, S.; BULLARD, J. Comparing the Cataloguing of Indigenous scholarships: first steps and findings. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 48, n. 4, p. 298-306, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2021-4-298

LO, G. “Aliens” vs. Catalogers: bias in the Library of Congress Subject Heading. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, [Binghamton], v. 38, n. 4, p. 170-196, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2019.1696069

LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J.; RAMÍREZ, I. D. T. Gender Terminology and Indexing Systems: The Case of Woman’s Body, Image and Visualization. Libri: International Journal of Libraries & Information Services, [Berlin], v. 57, n. 1, p. 34-44, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2007.34

MARTIN, J. M. Records, Responsibility, and Power: an overview of cataloging ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 59, n. 2/3, p. 281-304, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458

MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, D.; BUDD, J. M. Epistemic warrant for categorizational activities and the development of controlled vocabularies. Journal of Documentation, [Bingley], v. 73, n. 4, p. 700–715, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2016-0129

MAZZOCCHI, F. Knowledge Organization System (KOS): an introductory critical account. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 45, n. 1, p. 54-78, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-1-54

MCAULIFFE, B. Queer Identities, Queer Content and Library Classification: Is “Queering the Catalogue” the Answer? Journal of the Australian Library & Information Association, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 2, p. 213-219, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2021.1915618

MCCULLOCH, A. Recognising Critical Librarianship. inCite, [S. l.], v. 41, n. 1/2, p. 24, 2020.

MCDONALD, C. Call Us by Our Name (s): Shifting Representations of the Transgender Community in Classificatory Practice. In: Knowledge Organization at the Interface. Ergon-Verlag, 2020. p. 284-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-284

MCKENNON, E. Importing Hegemony: Library Information Systems and U.S. Hegemony in Canada and Latin America. Radical History Review, [Durham], n. 95, p. 45-69, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2006-95-45

MCTAVISH, J. R.; NEAL, D. R.; WATHEN, C. N. Is what you see what you get? Medical Subject Headings and their organizing work in the violence against women research literature. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 38, n. 5, p. 381-397, 2011.

MENESES TELLO, F. La carga ideológica en los instrumentos para la organización bibliográfica. Revista General de Información y Documentación, [Madrid], v. 23, n. 1, p. 97-131, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2013.v23.n1.41451

MOULAISON-SANDY, H.; BOSSALLER, J. Providing Cognitively Just Subject Access to Indigenous Knowledge through Knowledge Organization Systems. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 55, n. 3, p. 129-152, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1281858

MURPHY, D. Knowledge Organization Systems and Information Ethics for Visual Resources. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 2, p. 1-13, 2020.

MUSTAFA EL HADI, W. Cultural Frames of Ethics, a challenge for information and Knowledge Organization. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej, [Varsóvia], v. 114, n. 2, p. 23-39, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.452

NAUMIS, C. Subject Indexing Trends in Libraries of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 51, n. 5, p. 491-509, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.756094

NAUN, Chew Chiat. Objectivity and Subject Access in the Print Library. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 43, n. 2, p. 83-95, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n02_07

NYITRAY, K. J.; REIJERKERK, D. Searching for Paumanok: a study of Library of Congress Authorities and Classifications for Indigenous Long Island, New York. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 59, n. 5, p. 409-441, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1929627

OLSON, H. A. Difference, culture and change: the untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 29, n. 1/2, p. 53-71, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v29n01_04

OLSON, H. A. How We Construct Subjects: a feminist Analysis. Library Trends, [Champaign], v. 56, n. 2, p. 509-541, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2008.0007

OLSON, H. A. Patriarchal Structures of Subject Access and Subversive Techniques for Change. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, [Ontario], v. 26, n. 2/3, p. 1-29, 2001.

OLSON, H. A.; SCHLEGL, R. Standardization, Objectivity, and User Focus: A Meta-Analysis of Subject Access Critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 32, n. 2, p. 61-80, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n02_06

OLSRUD, L.; TELLMAN, J. C. Difficulties of subject access for information about minority groups. Acquisitions Librarian, [S. l.], n. 9-10, p. 47-60, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J101v05n09_06

PARÉ, G.; TRUDEL, M. C.; JAANA, M.; KITSIOU, S. Synthesizing Information Systems Knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, [Amsterdã], v. 52, n. 2, p. 183-199, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

PHELPS, S. F. Assessing a Consortium for a Multidisciplinary Subject. Collection Management, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 1, p. 35-56, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522

PINHO, F. A.; GUIMARÃES, J. A. C. Male Homosexuality in Brazilian Indexing Languages: Some Ethical Questions. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 39, n. 5, p. 363-369, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2012-5-363

RAGALLER, I.; RAFFERTY, P. Biases in the classification of Welsh art materialDispersion, dilettantism and depreciation. Aslib Proceedings, [S. l.], v. 64, n. 3, p. 262-273, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244563

REPORT of the SAC Ad-Hoc Subcommittee on concepts denoted by the term "Primitive". Technical Services Quarterly, [New York], v. 2, n. 1-2, p .121-153, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v02n01_09

RUMRILL, P. D.; FITZGERALD, S. M.; MERCHANT, W. R. Using Scoping Literature Reviews as a Means of Understanding and Interpreting Existing Literature. Work, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 3, p. 399-404, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2010-0998

SAMUELSSON, J. Knowledge Organization for feminism and feminist research: a discourse oriented study of systematic outlines, logical structure, semantics and the process of indexing. Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 37, n. 1, p. 3–28, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2010-1-3

SHUBERT, S. B. Critical views of LCSH--ten years later: a bibliographic essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 15, n. 2, p. 37-98, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v15n02_04

SMITH, C. A. Consumer language, patient language, and thesauri: a review of the literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 99, n. 2, p. 135-144, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.005

STROTTMAN, T. A. Some of Our Fifty are Missing: Library of Congress Subject Headings for Southwestern Cultures and History. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 45, n. 2, p. 41-64, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v45n02_04

TODARO, A. J.; MARTÍNEZ, A. M. La mujer en una lista de encabezamientos de materia en español. Investigación Bibliotecológica, [Ciudad de México], v. 20, n. 41, p. 195-206, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2006.41.4102

VITAL, L. P.; HERNANDEZ, B. F.; SANTOS, A. D. Análise de conteúdo da produção científica da organização do conhecimento em sua dimensão política e social no Brasil. Informação & Informação, Londrina, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1-27, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n3p1

WALSH, G. “Can We Get There from Here?” Negotiating the Washouts, Cave-Ins, Dead Ends, and Other Hazards on the Road to Research on Africa. Reference Librarian, [S. l.], v. 42, n. 87/88, p. 5-96, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v42n87_02

WATSON, B. M. “There was Sex but no Sexuality*:” Critical Cataloging and the Classification of Asexuality in LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, [Philadelphia], v. 58, n. 6, p. 547-565, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1796876

WATSON, B. M. Advancing Equitable Cataloging. In: NORTH AMERICAN SYMPOSIUM ON KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 8., 2021. Proceedings [...]. Washington: University of Washington, 2021. Disponível em: https://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/nasko/article/view/15887. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2022.

ZENG, M.L. Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, [Frankfurt], v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 160-182, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-160