The progressive and necessary adjustment in the table of personal income tax

Authors

  • Helio Massaoka Univesidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina
  • João Batista dos Reis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n1p27

Keywords:

Personal Income Tax, Progressive rate, Quantitative criteria of Rule-Matrix Effect.

Abstract

Until 1988, even without constitutional provision in this sense, the PIT was informed by the criterion of progressiveness. Paradoxically, in the year that the Federal Constitution was enacted 1988 to constitutionalize the obligation of the tax on income and earnings of any nature to be informed by the criterion of progressiveness, the legislature infra wrought radical changes, reducing the number of rates and as the percentage corresponding to the maximum applicable rate. Thus, since 1989, the rates that apply to the Income Tax became only two, seriously compromising the progressivity of the PIT. Added to this, lack of adjustment required in the PIT table, has caused problems in rule-array of tax incidence, especially in the consequent (prescriber), for the quantitative criterion (the tax base and tax rate).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Helio Massaoka, Univesidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina

Civil engineer by UEL, Legal Analyst Administrative Area TRT - 9th Region, Post-graduation in Labour Law and Procedural Law Labour by UNIFIL, Law Scholar at UEL.

João Batista dos Reis

Cable 3 reverse split of Firemen of the Paraná Military Police in Londrina / PR, Academic of law in UEL.

Published

2009-07-15

How to Cite

Massaoka, H., & Batista dos Reis, J. (2009). The progressive and necessary adjustment in the table of personal income tax. Revista Do Direito Público, 4(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.5433/1980-511X.2009v4n1p27

Issue

Section

Artigos