Comparison between abiotic parameters and the forest structure of a forest fragment and an eucalyptus (Eucalyptus saligna Smith) abandoned reforestation in the ecological park of Klabin, Telemaco Borba/PR

Authors

  • Valéria Teodoro da Silva Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Paulo Souza Medri Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Talita Parpinelli Ferracin Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Edmilson Bianchini Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • José Marcelo Domingues Torezan Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • José Antonio Pimenta Universidade Estadual de Londrina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0367.2010v31n1p37

Keywords:

Canopy cover, Diameter, Height, Little, Regeneration, Secondary forest.

Abstract

The forest structure causes a direct impact on the microclimate, being important for the continuity of the successional processes as well as for the restoration of ecosystem processes. Studies on forest structure are important to help determine ecological restoration actions, improving its implementation. In order to compare two forest formations, being one of them a secondary forest fragment and the other one an abandoned area of eucalyptus reforestation, some abiotic parameters were evaluated in this study, as well as the forest structure of the areas. Amongst the abiotic factors studied, there are: temperature and relative air humidity, soil compaction, moisture and soil pH and thickness of the litter. In order to analyze the forest structure, the following items were evaluated: herbaceous cover on the soil, rate of canopy cover, the diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA) and height of trees of all species. Among the parameters analyzed, comparing the areas, it was observed that: soil compaction was higher in the secondary forest (0.57 MPa) than in the eucalyptus reforestation (0.43 MPa); the presence of herbaceous plants on the soil occurred less in the eucalyptus reforestation (17.96%) than in the secondary forest (59.4%); the canopy cover index was of 45.99% for the eucalyptus reforestation, while in the secondary forest it was of 61.02%, being therefore higher for the latter. Nevertheless, according to Kolmogorov Smirnov test, the forest structure is not different between the areas, since the DBH and height values were not different between what was calculated and what was observed.


Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Valéria Teodoro da Silva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Mestrandos do Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Ecologia Vegetal, Depto de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; C.P.: 6001, CEP: 86051-970 – Londrina-Pr.

Paulo Souza Medri, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Mestrandos do Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Ecologia Vegetal, Depto de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; C.P.: 6001, CEP: 86051-970 – Londrina-Pr

Talita Parpinelli Ferracin, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Mestranda do Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Restauração de Ecossistemas (Labre), Depto de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; C.P.: 6001, CEP: 86051-970 – Londrina-PR.

Edmilson Bianchini, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Professores do Depto. de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; C.P.: 6001, CEP: 86051-970 – Londrina-PR.

José Marcelo Domingues Torezan, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Professores do Depto. de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; C.P.: 6001, CEP: 86051-970 – Londrina-PR.

José Antonio Pimenta, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Professores do Depto. de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina; C.P.: 6001, CEP: 86051-970 – Londrina-PR.

Published

2010-07-15

How to Cite

1.
Silva VT da, Medri PS, Ferracin TP, Bianchini E, Torezan JMD, Pimenta JA. Comparison between abiotic parameters and the forest structure of a forest fragment and an eucalyptus (Eucalyptus saligna Smith) abandoned reforestation in the ecological park of Klabin, Telemaco Borba/PR. Semin. Cienc. Biol. Saude [Internet]. 2010 Jul. 15 [cited 2024 May 18];31(1):37-51. Available from: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminabio/article/view/6604

Issue

Section

Artigos