Accessory navicular bone syndrome

Authors

  • Márcio Luís Duarte Webimagem
  • Bruno Fernandes Barros Brehme de Abreu Webimagem
  • José Luiz Masson de Almeida Prado Hospital São Camilo
  • Marcelo de Queiroz Pereira da Silva Webimagem,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0367.2019v40n1p119

Keywords:

Foot injuries, Magnetic resonance imaging, Tarsal bones.

Abstract

The accessory navicular bone, of which three variants have been described, is often considered as a normal anatomic and roentgenographic variant. Is a congenital anomaly in which the tuberosity of the navicular bone develops from a secondary ossification center and it has an incidence estimated between 2% and 14% with higher incidence in women being bilateral in 50-90% of the cases. Our aim was to report a case and review the literature about this uncommon lesion. We carried out a review of medical records, photographic record of diagnostic method, and review from the literature. A 59 years old woman with pain in the medial side of the left foot for two years. Refers worsening with walking. Physical examination with specific ankle negative tests, without bruise or edema. Denies torsion, trauma and surgeries. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates type II accessory navicular bone with edema and navicular bone edema. These findings with clinical complaint are compatible with accessory navicular bone syndrome. This report demonstrates the difficulty of diagnosing this lesion, since its physical examination is non-specific, and it can simulate more complex pathologies, requiring complementary tests for its correct diagnosis.

Author Biographies

Márcio Luís Duarte, Webimagem

Graduated in Medicine, Specialization in Musculoskeletal Radiology at Hospital São Camilo, São Paulo, São Paulo,
Brazil. Master in Evidence Based Health from UNIFESP. Doctor in Webimagem, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Bruno Fernandes Barros Brehme de Abreu, Webimagem

Graduated in Medicine, Residency in Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging at Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos, Santos,
São Paulo Brazil. Doctor in Webimagem, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

José Luiz Masson de Almeida Prado, Hospital São Camilo

Graduated in Medicine, Residency in Medical Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Doctor
at the São Camilo Hospital, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Marcelo de Queiroz Pereira da Silva, Webimagem,

Residency in Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging by Conjunto Hospitalar do Mandaqui. Head Doctor on Web picture,
Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

References

Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker FM, Van de Perre S, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. Accessory navicular bone: not such a normal variant. JBR-BTR. 2004 Sep-Oct; 87(5):250-2.

Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA. The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle. 1989 Dec;10(3):164-9.

Jegal H, Park YU, Kim JS, Choo HS, Seo YU, Lee KT. Accessory navicular syndrome in athlete vs general population. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Aug; 37(8):862-7.

Mosel LD, Kat E, Voyvodic F. Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone. Australas Radiol. 2004 Jun; 48(2):267-71.

Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F, Parisien M, Glucksman WJ, Gandolfo LH. The symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular bone: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995 Jun; 195(3):849-53.
Miyamoto W, Takao M, Yamada K, Yasui Y, Matsushita T. Reconstructive surgery using interference screw fixation for painful accessory navicular in adult athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Oct; 132 (10):1423-7.

Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R. Percutaneous Drilling of Symptomatic Accessory Navicular in Young Athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr; 33(4):531-5.

Published

2019-09-05

How to Cite

1.
Duarte ML, Abreu BFBB de, Prado JLM de A, Silva M de QP da. Accessory navicular bone syndrome. Semin. Cienc. Biol. Saude [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 5 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];40(1):119-22. Available from: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminabio/article/view/33420

Issue

Section

Relatos de Casos