Ingarden and an ontology of the literary work of arte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/el.2017v20.e31029Keywords:
Ingarden, Ontology, LiteratureAbstract
The present article aims at analyzing Roman Ingarden's project for an ontology of the literary work of art by elucidating his concept of ontology, its assumptions, implications, and consequences. It thus addresses his concerns regarding the methodological scope for studying and comprehending the literary work of art's mode of being and operatingDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
BRAIDA, Celso R. A Forma e o sentido da frase "isso é arte". In: BRAIDA, Celso R.; DRUCKER, Claudia; BARBOZA, Jair (Org.). Café Filosófico: estética e filosofia da arte. Florianópolis: Edufsc, 2014a. p. 23-56.
BRAIDA, Celso R. Tópicos em ontologia. Florianópolis: Rocca Brayde, 2013.
BRAIDA, Celso R. Roman Ingarden. documento de aula. 2014b.
CARROLL, Noël. Beyond aesthetics: philosophical essays. New York: Cambridge University, 2003.
DANTO, Arthur. The Transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1981.
DANTO, Arthur. The Philosophical disenfranchisement of art. New York: Columbia University, 1986.
DICIONÁRIO GROVE DE MÚSICA: edição concisa (ed. Stanley Sadie; co.ed. Alison Latham). Tradução. Eduardo Francisco Alves. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1994.
DRUMMOND, John J. Historical dictionary of Husserl’s philosophy. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2007.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. Ingarden’s theory of values and the evaluation of the work of art. In: DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan; McCORMICK, Peter (Ed.). On the aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: interpretations and assessments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
FERREIRA, Debora Pazetto. Análise categorial da arte em Amie Thomasson. 2010. 144f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) – Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2010.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Truth and method. 2. ed. Tradução: Joel Weinsheimer; Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2006.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Off the beaten track. Tradução: Julian Young e Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Nietzsche: the will to power as art, the eternal recurrence of the same. Tradução: David Farrrell Krell. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1991. v.1, 2.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Logical investigations. Tradução: J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge, 2001.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. Tradução: Daniel O. Dahlstrom. New York: Hackett, 2014.
INGARDEN, Roman. The Literary work of art. Tradução: George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1973a.
INGARDEN, Roman. The Cognition of the literary work of art. Tradução: Ruth Ann Crowley, Kenneth R. Olson. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1973b.
INGARDEN, Roman. Ontology of work of art: the musical work, the picture, the architectural work, the film. Tradução: Raymond Meyer, John T. Goldthwait. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1989.
INGARDEN, Roman. Controversy over the existence of the world. (vol. 01) Tradução: Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, 2013.
INGARDEN, Roman. Aesthetic experience and aesthetic object. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 21, n. 3, p. 289-313, 1961.
INGARDEN, Roman. Artistic and aesthetic values. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 4, n. 3, p. 198-213, 1964.
INGARDEN, Roman. Phenomenological aesthetics: an attempt at defining its range. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 33, n. 3, p. 257-269, 1975a,.
INGARDEN, Roman. On the motives which led Husserl to transcendental idealism. Tradução: Arnór Hannibalsson. Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975b.
KÜNG, Guido. Roman Ingarden (1893-1970): Ontological phenomenology. In: SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. The Phenomenological movement. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
MARGOLIS, Joseph. Recent currents in aesthetics of relevance to contemporary visual artists. Leonardo, v. 12, n. 2, p.111-119, 1979.
MCFEE, Graham. Artistic Judgement: a framework for philosophical aesthetics. London: Springer, 2011.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. Roman Ingarden's ontology and aesthetics. Quebec: University of Ottowa Press, 1997.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. Roman Ingarden's "The Literary work of art": exposition and analyses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 45, n. 3, p. 351-381, 1985.
RYLE, Gilbert. Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Wesens.ss by Roman Ingarden (Review). Mind, v. 36, n. 143, p. 366-370, 1927.
SOKOLOWSKI, Robert. Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Cambridge University, 1999.
SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. The Phenomenological movement. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
THOMASSON, Amie. The Ontology of art. In: KIVY, Peter (ed.). The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
THOMASSON, Amie. Roman Ingarden. In: The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab/Center for the Study of Language and Information/Stanford University, 2012.(ed. Edward N. Zalta). Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/ingarden/.
THOMASSON, Amie. Fiction and metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
BRAIDA, Celso R. Tópicos em ontologia. Florianópolis: Rocca Brayde, 2013.
BRAIDA, Celso R. Roman Ingarden. documento de aula. 2014b.
CARROLL, Noël. Beyond aesthetics: philosophical essays. New York: Cambridge University, 2003.
DANTO, Arthur. The Transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1981.
DANTO, Arthur. The Philosophical disenfranchisement of art. New York: Columbia University, 1986.
DICIONÁRIO GROVE DE MÚSICA: edição concisa (ed. Stanley Sadie; co.ed. Alison Latham). Tradução. Eduardo Francisco Alves. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1994.
DRUMMOND, John J. Historical dictionary of Husserl’s philosophy. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2007.
DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan. Ingarden’s theory of values and the evaluation of the work of art. In: DZIEMIDOK, Bohdan; McCORMICK, Peter (Ed.). On the aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: interpretations and assessments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
FERREIRA, Debora Pazetto. Análise categorial da arte em Amie Thomasson. 2010. 144f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) – Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2010.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Truth and method. 2. ed. Tradução: Joel Weinsheimer; Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2006.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Off the beaten track. Tradução: Julian Young e Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Nietzsche: the will to power as art, the eternal recurrence of the same. Tradução: David Farrrell Krell. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1991. v.1, 2.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Logical investigations. Tradução: J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge, 2001.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. Tradução: Daniel O. Dahlstrom. New York: Hackett, 2014.
INGARDEN, Roman. The Literary work of art. Tradução: George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1973a.
INGARDEN, Roman. The Cognition of the literary work of art. Tradução: Ruth Ann Crowley, Kenneth R. Olson. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1973b.
INGARDEN, Roman. Ontology of work of art: the musical work, the picture, the architectural work, the film. Tradução: Raymond Meyer, John T. Goldthwait. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1989.
INGARDEN, Roman. Controversy over the existence of the world. (vol. 01) Tradução: Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, 2013.
INGARDEN, Roman. Aesthetic experience and aesthetic object. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 21, n. 3, p. 289-313, 1961.
INGARDEN, Roman. Artistic and aesthetic values. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 4, n. 3, p. 198-213, 1964.
INGARDEN, Roman. Phenomenological aesthetics: an attempt at defining its range. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 33, n. 3, p. 257-269, 1975a,.
INGARDEN, Roman. On the motives which led Husserl to transcendental idealism. Tradução: Arnór Hannibalsson. Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975b.
KÜNG, Guido. Roman Ingarden (1893-1970): Ontological phenomenology. In: SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. The Phenomenological movement. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
MARGOLIS, Joseph. Recent currents in aesthetics of relevance to contemporary visual artists. Leonardo, v. 12, n. 2, p.111-119, 1979.
MCFEE, Graham. Artistic Judgement: a framework for philosophical aesthetics. London: Springer, 2011.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. Roman Ingarden's ontology and aesthetics. Quebec: University of Ottowa Press, 1997.
MITSCHERLING, Jeff. Roman Ingarden's "The Literary work of art": exposition and analyses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 45, n. 3, p. 351-381, 1985.
RYLE, Gilbert. Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Wesens.ss by Roman Ingarden (Review). Mind, v. 36, n. 143, p. 366-370, 1927.
SOKOLOWSKI, Robert. Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Cambridge University, 1999.
SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. The Phenomenological movement. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
THOMASSON, Amie. The Ontology of art. In: KIVY, Peter (ed.). The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
THOMASSON, Amie. Roman Ingarden. In: The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab/Center for the Study of Language and Information/Stanford University, 2012.(ed. Edward N. Zalta). Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/ingarden/.
THOMASSON, Amie. Fiction and metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Downloads
Published
2017-12-01
How to Cite
Tavares, O. G. (2017). Ingarden and an ontology of the literary work of arte. Estação Literária, 20, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.5433/el.2017v20.e31029
Issue
Section
Artigos do Dossiê Temático
License
A revista se reserva os direitos autorais sobre as contribuições publicadas, sem retribuição material para o autor, podendo disponibilizá-las on-line no modo Open Access, mediante sistema próprio ou de outros bancos de dados; também poderá efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com o intuito de manter o padrão culto da língua, contando com a anuência final dos autores. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
